Re: Re: On hearsay

2012-11-06 Thread Roger Clough
: 2012-11-05, 22:01:33 Subject: Re: On hearsay On 11/5/2012 2:36 PM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King No, they don't all have to had witnessed it, they can simply be told about it. In court that is called hearsay. You are still thinking that my observers are only human

Re: On hearsay

2012-11-06 Thread Stephen P. King
the following content - From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-05, 22:01:33 Subject: Re: On hearsay On 11/5/2012 2:36 PM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King No, they don't all have to had witnessed it, they can simply be told about it. In court that is called hearsay

Re: Re: On hearsay

2012-11-06 Thread Roger Clough
: everything-list Time: 2012-11-06, 10:36:37 Subject: Re: On hearsay On 11/6/2012 4:59 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King OK, you must be talking about physical evidence then. Hi Roger, What makes it physical? Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 11/6/2012 Forever

Re: On hearsay

2012-11-06 Thread Stephen P. King
, especially near the end. -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-06, 10:36:37 Subject: Re: On hearsay On 11/6/2012 4:59 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King OK, you must be talking about physical evidence

Re: On hearsay

2012-11-05 Thread Stephen P. King
On 11/5/2012 2:36 PM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King No, they don't all have to had witnessed it, they can simply be told about it. In court that is called hearsay. You are still thinking that my observers are only human... Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 11/5/2012 Forever