Title: Re: Rucker's Infinity, Tegmark's TOE, and Cantor's Ab
Bruno M wrote:
Friday, September 06, 2002 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Rucker's Infinity, (or
whatever)
Dear John,
Bohm's statement is quite coherent with his philosophy.
SNIP
In its "implicate order" Bohm is explicitely
I am a new member of this group as of 09/01/02. I read Hal Finney's and
others comments regarding Rucker's Infinity and the Mind which I have read
several times. I also am aware of Max Tegmark's TOE and I have read much of
the material related to Georg Cantor's transfinite numbers. I have a
2 matches
Mail list logo
