George Levy wrote:
The scientist could prove that he is not alone by invoking the principle
of sufficient reason: nothing is arbitrary and exist with no reason. If
something exists in a particular arbitrary way (himself) with no reason
for him to be in that particular way, then all other
George Levy wrote:
The scientist could prove that he is not alone by invoking the principle
of sufficient reason: nothing is arbitrary and exist with no reason. If
something exists in a particular arbitrary way (himself) with no reason
for him to be in that particular way, then all other
This is an extract from the full work on solipsism. It is one special
section written in the first person, for what else could a solipsist
scientist do? I'd be interested in any comments... it paints a rather
bizarre picture of science.
-
I,
The scientist could prove that he is not alone by invoking the
principle of sufficient reason: nothing is arbitrary and exist with no
reason. If something exists in a particular arbitrary way (himself)
with no reason for him to be in that particular way, then all
other alternatives of him must
George Levy:
The scientist could prove that he is not alone by
invoking the principle of sufficient reason: nothing is arbitrary and exist
with no reason. If something exists in a particular arbitrary way (himself)
with no reason for him to be in that particular way, then all other
5 matches
Mail list logo