On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote
I would call that reacting.
Call it whatever you like, just don't call me late for dinner.
But you're welcome to call it causal
I think I'll do just that, and thank you for giving me permission.
I believe that you
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
in (my) deterministic agnosticism everything is entailed (var: causal)
That belief is not consistent with the observation of real life. If that
were true we couldn't know anything until we knew everything, and clearly
we don't
JohnC
thanks. I expected better from you:
*...we couldn't know anything until we knew everything*,...
In general I am missing from your statements *I THINK* as* *
*esasing *the heaviness of the ideas. We think we know a lot, call it:
conventional sciences etc., with a brilliant technology that
On 9/2/2012 8:02 AM, John Clark wrote:
Neither can I, but I can argue that everything is causal or everything is not
causal.
You mean, ...or not everything is causal.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
While computers are causal
Yes.
perception is not causal. Nothing that living things do is causal.
Nothing??? So when you're running and perceive a brick wall directly in
front of you getting larger by the second
John C
I usually appreciate your ways... not in the post below.
The word 'causal' is ambiguous: in (my) deterministic agnosticism
everything is entailed (var: causal) but we know only part of the
circumstances of entailment. Even what we know is not so sure 'fits' the
infinite complexity BEYOND
Hi Craig Weinberg
While computers are causal, perception is not causal.
Nothing that living things do is causal. They have an
uncaused first or governing cause called the self.
Thus life does not have to be causal and isn't.
Monads operate in such a fashion. They are not
causal except if
On Friday, August 31, 2012 8:30:12 AM UTC-4, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
While computers are causal, perception is not causal.
Nothing that living things do is causal. They have an
uncaused first or governing cause called the self.
Thus life does not have to be causal and
8 matches
Mail list logo
