Re: Measuring a system in a superposition of states vs in a mixed state

2018-11-17 Thread agrayson2000
On Friday, November 16, 2018 at 4:39:42 PM UTC, scerir wrote: > > > Il 16 novembre 2018 alle 15.38 agrays...@gmail.com ha > scritto: > > > > On Friday, November 16, 2018 at 10:14:32 AM UTC, scerir wrote: > > > Il 16 novembre 2018 alle 10.19 agrays...@gmail.com ha scritto: > > > > On

Re: Measuring a system in a superposition of states vs in a mixed state

2018-11-17 Thread agrayson2000
On Saturday, November 17, 2018 at 4:39:08 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Saturday, November 17, 2018 at 4:22:35 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, November 16, 2018 at 4:39:42 PM UTC, scerir wrote: >>> >>> >>> Il 16 novembre 2018 alle 15.38

Re: Measuring a system in a superposition of states vs in a mixed state

2018-11-17 Thread agrayson2000
On Saturday, November 17, 2018 at 4:22:35 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, November 16, 2018 at 4:39:42 PM UTC, scerir wrote: >> >> >> Il 16 novembre 2018 alle 15.38 agrays...@gmail.com ha scritto: >> >> >> >> On Friday, November 16, 2018 at 10:14:32 AM UTC, scerir wrote:

Coherent states of a superposition

2018-11-17 Thread agrayson2000
If you write a superposition as a sum of eigenstates, why is it important, or relevant, or even true that the component states are coherent since eigenstates with distinct eigenvalues are orthogonal. This means there is no interference between the components of the superposition. AG -- You