Hi Jacques MM, Russell, and other Everythingers/ManyWorlders
Jacques M Mallah wrote:
> At least, unlike some q-immorters, you admit that you do not think
>measure decreases with time.
Indeed. Although such a question deserves more attention, I would say
that my current *feeling* is that
Wei Dai, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, writes:
> Bayesian analysis in general does not depend on the Strong SSA, but any
> Bayesian analysis where you try to compute P(X | I observe Y) does because
> you need the Strong SSA to compute P(I observe Y | X) and P(I observe Y |
> not X).
>
> My example is one o
In a message dated 99-06-02 06:52:55 EDT, Jacques Mallah wrote:
> [...] I want to establish a key point. Do you admit that
>if, in fact, your measure were to decrease (for example) exponentially
>with time, you would not be immortal in any meaningful sense?
>If you admit that, then we could
3 matches
Mail list logo
