Dear Bruno:
Thank you for your comments they are helpful as always.
I took a quick look at your universal dovetailer post and then went back to
look at Tegmark's paper etc.
Rather than continue to struggle to describe my model mathematically, I
describe it below mechanically in terms of a sort
Hal Ruhl wrote:
>Turing's use of Cantor's diagonal argument results in the general lack of a
>decision procedure even if a FAS is countably infinite.
>
>Turing also tells us by the same approach that FAS cannot get any larger
>than that so such a FAS must be complete.
>
>Godel tells us that mos
I slipped a gear. I would expect X in my mechanical description to be more
on the order of 10 to the power 17. Roughly the proton radius divided by
1000 times the Planck Length.
Hal
3 matches
Mail list logo
