Hello,
--- Joel Dobrzelewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russell and Brent:
I understand this is an extreme position, but I
state it this way on
purpose: to bring the issue to the foreground and
get to the heart of the
problem of science today.
As long as we insist that continuous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OO O O
Othen lim i-inf e(i) = inf.
O
O This will not give you a uniform
O distribution on infinitely many things.
O O
O O yes. i agree.
O O
Hello again...
I'm finding these (older) discussions about flying rabbits to be quite
interesting. :)
Let me inject these thoughts...
1. The absence of flying rabbits from our (apparent) collective history does
not seem to me to be evidence that they do not exist in other worlds. Nor
does it
You picked a bad example with pi. Many mathematicians manipulate pi
with exact precision in their calculations. Many use computer programs
to do this also, eg Mathematica. The lack of any possible representation as a
rational number does not prove a barrier to this.
Your point would be better
4 matches
Mail list logo
