juergen wrote:
> Russell, at the risk of beating a dead horse: a uniform measure is _not_ a
> uniform probability distribution. Why were measures invented in the first
> place? To deal with infinite sets. You cannot have a uniform probability
> distribution on infinitely many things.
The la
> From: Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think we got into this mess debating whether an infinite set could
> support a uniform measure. I believe I have demonstrated this.
> I've yet to see anything that disabuses me of the notion that a
> probability distribtu
Brent Meeker wrote:
> Hello Charles
>
> On 23-Oct-01, Charles Goodwin wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Brent Meeker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2001 12:06 p.m.
> >> To: Charles Goodwin
> >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: RE: ODP: Free will/con
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > From: Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I think we got into this mess debating whether an infinite set could
> > support a uniform measure. I believe I have demonstrated this.
> > I've yet to see anything that disabuses me of t
4 matches
Mail list logo