At 13:08 13/04/04 -0700, George Levy wrote:
Put in another way, *either* the massive computer simulates the exact
laws of physics (exact with comp = the laws extractible from the
measure on all 1-computations) in which case we belong to it but
in that case we belong also to all its "copy" in Plato
Dear Stephen,
snip
> [BM]
> Giving that I *assume* that arithmetical truth is independent
> of me, you and the whole physical reality (if that exists), "I" do have
> infinite resources in that Platonia. Remember that from the first person
> point of view it does not matter where and how, in Platon
At 09:58 13/04/04 -0400, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> 6) This shows that if we are in a massive computer running in
> a universe, then (supposing we know it or believe it) to
> predict the future of any experiment we decide to carry one
> (for example testing A or B) we need to take into account all
> r
Hi Stephen:
What I am basically saying is that you can not define a thing without
simultaneously defining another thing that consists of all that is "left
over" in the ensemble of building blocks. I suspect that usually the "left
over" thing is of little practical use.
However, this duality a
4 matches
Mail list logo
