Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-07 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hi Hal, In my questions about truth etc I was not really looking for a response but was rather trying to demonstrate the need for additional information in your theory. I don't have a theory. Just an argument showing that if we are machine then eventually physics is derivable from machine

Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-07 Thread Hal Ruhl
Hi Bruno: At 06:40 AM 12/7/2004, you wrote: Hi Hal, In my questions about truth etc I was not really looking for a response but was rather trying to demonstrate the need for additional information in your theory. I don't have a theory. Just an argument showing that if we are machine then

Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-07 Thread Hal Ruhl
At 06:37 PM 12/7/2004, you wrote: To clarify - the All contains all information simultaneously [see the definition in the original post] - including ALL Truing machines with ALL possible output tapes - so it contains simultaneously both output tapes re your comment below. But if there is a fact

Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-07 Thread Hal Ruhl
Hi Jesse: At 09:23 PM 12/7/2004, you wrote: Hal Ruhl wrote: To clarify - the All contains all information simultaneously [see the definition in the original post] - including ALL Truing machines with ALL possible output tapes - so it contains simultaneously both output tapes re your comment

Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-07 Thread Hal Ruhl
Maybe this will help: The All contains all possible output states of all Turing machines [among all manner of other info such as states of really messy universes] simultaneously. These states are given Physical reality by evolving Somethings in random order over and over. Some such sequences

Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-07 Thread Jesse Mazer
From: Hal Ruhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jesse Mazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:19:02 -0500 Hi Jesse: At 09:23 PM 12/7/2004, you wrote: Hal Ruhl wrote: To clarify - the All contains all information simultaneously [see the definition in

Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-07 Thread Hal Ruhl
Hi Jesse: The All contains inconsistent FAS [we have no issue here as far as I can tell] and thus all of the theorems of such FAS as some of the kernels of information simultaneously. [Do we have an issue here?] This content makes the All inconsistent. [OK?] The All does not output anything

Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-07 Thread Jesse Mazer
From: Hal Ruhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:41:45 -0500 Maybe this will help: The All contains all possible output states of all Turing machines [among all manner of other info such as states of really messy