RE: Belief Statements

2005-01-18 Thread Hal Ruhl
What I am really talking about is availability of choice. My All/Nothing model appears to preclude choice. In this it seems a member of a class that assume all information already exists. Awhile ago I posted on another model in which there is a Nothing. This Nothing suffers the same

Re: Belief Statements

2005-01-18 Thread Danny Mayes
I remember your previous posts on nothing, and how it decays. However, this concept requires an intelligence to be present with nothing to cause nothingness to decay, does it not? It is intelligence and consciousness which defines things and makes relative comparisons. Danny Mayes Hal

Re: Belief Statements

2005-01-18 Thread Hal Ruhl
At 02:37 PM 1/18/2005, you wrote: I remember your previous posts on nothing, and how it decays. However, this concept requires an intelligence to be present with nothing to cause nothingness to decay, does it not? It is intelligence and consciousness which defines things and makes relative

Re: Belief Statements

2005-01-18 Thread Danny Mayes
It may be a freshman philosophy question, but it can't be a physics question because you are dealing with issues occurring before our known physics were established. Hal Ruhl wrote: At 02:37 PM 1/18/2005, you wrote: I remember your previous posts on nothing, and how it decays. However, this

Re: Belief Statements

2005-01-18 Thread Hal Ruhl
At 04:41 PM 1/18/2005, you wrote: It may be a freshman philosophy question, but it can't be a physics question because you are dealing with issues occurring before our known physics were established. You really miss the point. It is a question of logic and finding an unavoidable meaningful