Colin Geoffrey Hales wrote:
Colin Hales writes:
The very fact that the laws of physics, derived and validated using
phenomenality, cannot predict or explain how appearances are generated
is
proof that the appearance generator is made of something else and that
something else
Le 26-nov.-06, à 07:09, Colin Geoffrey Hales a écrit :
I know your work is mathematics, not philosophy. Thank goodness! I can
see
how your formalism can tell you 'about' a universe. I can see how
inspection of the mathematics tells a story about the view from within
and
without.
If the mind is what the brain does, then what exactly is a coffee cup
doing?
It's not mind-ing.
For that question is just as valid and has just as complex an
answer...
Of course not.
.yet we do not ask it. Every object in the universe is like this.
This is the mother of all
Quentin Anciaux writes:
But the point is to assume this nonsense to take a conclusion, to see
where it leads. Why imagine a possible zombie which is functionnally
identical if there weren't any dualistic view in the first place ! Only in
dualistic framework it is possible to imagine a
Hi,
Le Mardi 28 Novembre 2006 00:00, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
Quentin Anciaux writes:
But the point is to assume this nonsense to take a conclusion, to see
where it leads. Why imagine a possible zombie which is functionnally
identical if there weren't any dualistic view in the first
5 matches
Mail list logo
