To avoid to much posts in your mail box, I send all my comments in this
post,
Hi Brent,
1a) Brent meeker wrote (quoting Jim Heldberg) :
Atheism is not a religion, just as a vacant lot is not a type of
building, and health is not a form of sickness. Atheism is not a
religion.
--- Jim
Dear Bruno,
may I ask you to spell out your "B" and "D"?
in your:
Let D = the proposition "God exists", "~" = NOT, B = believes.<
Where I think I cannot substitute your "~" for the "=NOT" - or, if the entire line is
meaning ONE idea, that "B" believes both the affirmative and the negatory.
Al
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:41:31PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> Le 13-déc.-06, à 02:45, Russell Standish a écrit :
>
> > Essentially that is the Occam razor theorem. Simpler universes have
> > higher probability.
>
>
> In the ASSA(*) realm I can give sense to this. I think Hal Finney and
Bruno Marchal writes:
[SP] It's difficult to find the right words here. I think we can all agree on
the appearance
of a physical reality as a starting point.
Yes.
[SP] The common sense view is that there is an
underlying primitive physical reality generating this appearance, without w
Bruno Marchal wrote:
To avoid to much posts in your mail box, I send all my comments in this
post,
Hi Brent,
1a) Brent meeker wrote (quoting Jim Heldberg) :
Atheism is not a religion, just as a vacant lot is not a type of
building, and health is not a form of sickness. Atheism is not
The Absolute Self-Sampling Assumption (ASSA) holds that some existances
are more probable than others and therefore have a greater "measure".
The consequence being that it is probable our perspectives and the
universe around us are common, likely, and exist with a high level of
duplication. I be
6 matches
Mail list logo
