Jason Resch writes:
> Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> > What about when multiple equally valid OM's exist? I don't agree that they
> > are all perceived.
> > If I am to be duplicated and one of the copies tortured, I am worried,
> > because this is subjectively
> > equivalent to expecting tortur
Le 18-janv.-07, à 06:38, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> To avoid to much posts in your mail box, I send all my comments in
>> this post,
>> Hi Brent,
>> 1a) Brent meeker wrote (quoting Jim Heldberg) :
>> Atheism is not a religion, just as a vacant lot is not a type of
>>
Le 11-janv.-07, à 15:15, Russell Standish a écrit :
> I would further hypothesise that all intelligences must
> arise evolutionarily.
I do believe this too, but once an intelligence is there it can be
copied in short time. Dishonest people do that with ideas, publishers
do that with writting
Le 18-janv.-07, à 04:10, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
>
>> I would say "relative to a theory explaining the appearances", not
>> just to the appearances.
>
> Well, it is relative to appearance, but people go on to theorise that
> these appearances are "true reality".
From Pythagoras to Pro
Hi John,
Le 21-janv.-07, à 23:16, John Mikes a écrit :
> Thanks again for your kind explanations -
You are welcome.
> and am ready for Wi Fi.
Thanks for telling. I will come back on this ASAP (tomorrow).
Bruno
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this m
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> OK, but I am looking at it from the perspective of going into the replicator.
> Suppose you were offered either the above choice - you are duplicated and
> one of the copies will be tortured - or a biased coin will be tosed and you
> will have a 51% chance of being tor
Bruno Marchal writes:
> > > 1c) Brent wrote (to Stathis):
> >> How is this infinite regress avoided in our world? By
> >> consciousness
> >> not representing the rest of the world.
> >> That is an interesting idea. You could elaborate a bit perhaps? I do
> >> agree with your most of yo
Bruno Marchal writes:
> Le 18-janv.-07, à 04:10, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
>
> >
> >> I would say "relative to a theory explaining the appearances", not
> >> just to the appearances.
> >
> > Well, it is relative to appearance, but people go on to theorise that
> > these appearances are "t
Jason Resch writes:
> Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> > OK, but I am looking at it from the perspective of going into the
> > replicator.
> > Suppose you were offered either the above choice - you are duplicated and
> > one of the copies will be tortured - or a biased coin will be tosed and you
>
9 matches
Mail list logo
