It's getting such and sucher - the multiple, back-and-forth gets dizzying.
So I will copy certain sentences of the Stathistical discussion for
reflection.-Below is the orig.Maze.
JM earlier: What else can we 'imagine'? Ideational -- of whom? Mine?
John M, et al,
It is a fact of existential experiencing that
minds are typically so innured to their millieu
and environmental encounters that 'alternative
interpretations' are overlooked and missed to
appreciation and understanding.
--- When it became apparent to me that
With comp, what holds 'your lot together are the relation between
numbers. The apparent third person infinite regression stops at the
level of those relations. The first person is most probably confronted
with many infinities, but this should not be considered as
you asked interesting questions, but I think the fundamental ones are still
MP:(bold and in bold):
I mean the big and unanswered question is WHERE are numbers?
I would ask (joining your heresy):
1. Where did numbers come from? (an answer may be: They are GOD to believe
Mail list logo