Hello Everythingers,
I was introduced to this list by Jurgen Schmidhuber, who spoke at a
meeting that we had here in Linz in 2005. A very interesting meeting
with Ed Fredkin, Tom Toffoli, Karl Svozil and a few others to make it
a very full couple of days.
One of the recurring ideas here
Jamie,
wise words, but no cigar here. For a RE-Evaluation I have insufficient
knowledge even in the E - to compare it into a RE-.
Statistical is different: I question the topical meaning, as being just a
'model'-related idea (in MY sense: as a limited topical fraction of the
totality within
Well, my friend, I am no Georg Cantor, but
I am of a like-mind to him.
What I have discerned, is an important insight
that indeed resolves the chasm, and does, as you
point out, make things mightily more complicated.
There is level of complication that has been with
us all the time, but which
Hi Mark,
Just a preliminary remark before I comment your post. Contrary to what
Russell says in his book, I am not at all a philosopher, I am not
trying to propose a view of the world or a conception of reality. As I
said in the joining post my initial goal was just to understand
molecular
Hi Tim
Le 03-avr.-07, à 12:03, Tim Boykett wrote (in part):
One of the recurring ideas here is that of mathematicalism - an
idea
that I understand to be that we perceive things as physical that have
a certain
mathematical structure. One of the everything ideas that results is
that
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi Tim
Le 03-avr.-07, à 12:03, Tim Boykett wrote (in part):
One of the recurring ideas here is that of mathematicalism - an
idea
that I understand to be that we perceive things as physical that have
a certain
mathematical structure. One of the everything ideas
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 05:37:25PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi Mark,
Just a preliminary remark before I comment your post. Contrary to what
Russell says in his book, I am not at all a philosopher, I am not
trying to propose a view of the world or a conception of reality. As I
I
7 matches
Mail list logo
