Re: measure problem

Le 26-avr.-07, à 16:31, Juergen Schmidhuber a écrit : > Hi Max, > > in this particular universe it's going well, thank you! > > As promised, I had a look at your paper. I think > it is well written and fun to read. I've got a few comments > though, mostly on the nature of math vs computation,

Re: measure problem

Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Le 26-avr.-07, à 16:31, Juergen Schmidhuber a écrit : > > > >> Hi Max, >> >> in this particular universe it's going well, thank you! >> >> As promised, I had a look at your paper. I think >> it is well written and fun to read. I've got a few comments >> though, mostly

Re: measure problem

Dear Bruno, I look at your 'chat' with Max and Juergen with "awe": some words do sound as if representing some meaning to me, too, from my earlier accumulation of readings. My idea about your uncertainty of the application of 'comp' (and 'physical') could be (poorly) worded in your 'logician', Max

Re: RSSA / ASSA / Single Mind Theory

Thanks, Jason, i did not think in marvels of (reductionist) physics when contemplating about mentality - my mistake, but that's where I live in. I don't 'make' copies and have no idea "how many" of "how many" details will destroy the identity, when there are more and less qualifying aspects. You