Le 05-oct.-07, à 19:56, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>
> Saibal Mitra wrote:
>> 1) looks better because there is no unambiguous definition of "next".
>> However, I don't understand the "shared by everyone" part. Different
>> persons are different programs who cannot exactly represent the
>> "observer
We're not getting very far with this. Let me put some alternative
equivalent versions of the ASSA as I use it.
The ASSA is the assumption that the SSSA applies to the question of
what our "next OM" will be.
Alternatively:
Given an assumed "birth OM", the ASSA is the assumption that our
current
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> I think that Maudlin refers to the conjunction of the comp hyp and
> supervenience, where consciousness is supposed to be linked (most of
> the time in a sort of "real-time" way) to the *computational activity*
> of the brain, and not to the history of any of the state o
3 matches
Mail list logo
