Bruno Marchal skrev:
Le 29-nov.-07, à 17:22, Torgny Tholerus a écrit :
There is a difference between unlimited and infinite. Unlimited
just says that it has no limit, but everything is still finite. If
you
add something to a finite set, then the new set will always be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
On Nov 28, 9:56 pm, Torgny Tholerus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You only need models of cellular automata. If you have a model and
rules for that model, then one event will follow after another event,
according to the rules. And after that event will follow
Hi,
I recall the proof that N^N is not enumerable.
I recall that N^N is the set of functions from N to N. Such functions
associate a natural number to each natural number. Example:
factorial = {(0, 1) (1, 1) (2, 2) (3, 6) (4, 24) (5 120) ...}
of course the same information is provided by the
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:00:17 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Theory of Everything based on E8 by Garrett Lisi
Jesse Mazer skrev:
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:55:20 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As
Jesse Mazer skrev:
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:55:20 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As soon as you say the set of ALL numbers, then you are forced to
define the word ALL here. And for every definition, you are forced to
introduce a limit. It is not possible to define the word
5 matches
Mail list logo
