On 07 Aug 2009, at 20:35, Brent Meeker wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Very important post, Peter. We are progressing.
On 06 Aug 2009, at 19:09, 1Z wrote:
On 31 July, 18:55, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 31 Jul 2009, at 18:05, 1Z wrote:
If it isn;t RITSIAR, it cannot be
On 08 Aug 2009, at 05:20, ronaldheld wrote:
As a formally trained Physicist, what do I accept?
It depends of many things. Most physicists and non physicists take
more or less for granted an Aristotelian picture of reality.
Now, if you are willing to believe that you can survive classical
Against Physics
Let me go through my full chain of reasoning here, before I draw my
conclusion:
So the world that I perceive seems pretty orderly. When I drive to
work, it's always where I expect it to be. The people are always the
same. I pick up where I left off on the previous day, and
On 08 Aug 2009, at 20:01, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Actually physicians have literally created new interesting branch in
math
I mean physicists of course. So sorry.
Well, actually I know a physician, Philippe Smets, the creator of
IRIDIA, where I am working, who was a physician, not a
On 08 Aug 2009, at 22:44, rexallen...@gmail.com wrote:
So physicalism in fact offers no advantage over just asserting that
our conscious experience just exists. Why are my perceptions orderly
and why are my predictions about what will happen next usually
correct? Because that's just the
rexallen...@gmail.com wrote:
Against Physics
Let me go through my full chain of reasoning here, before I draw my
conclusion:
...
So physicalism in fact offers no advantage over just asserting that
our conscious experience just exists.
If you suffer epileptic seizures seeing a
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Brent Meekermeeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
If you suffer epileptic seizures seeing a neurosurgeon may offer considerable
advantage.
If that's what the future held for me, then that's exactly what I
would do. Otherwise, I wouldn't do that, since it wouldn't
7 matches
Mail list logo
