2009/9/14 Brent Meeker :
> So then question then becomes how close together do the intermediate points
> have to
> be to constitute the "same" experience.
> An interesting question. We might investigate it empirically by noting how
> closely the
> brain processes during one experience of X are
2009/9/2 Brent Meeker :
>> I'm afraid that still doesn't work. I realise it's counter intuitive,
>> but this is the point - to recalibrate the intuitions. 'Standard' CTM
>> postulates that the mind is a computation implemented by the brain,
>> and hence in principle implementable by any physica
On 09 Sep 2009, at 09:21, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Next post: Cantor theorem(s). There is NO bijection between N and
> N^N. I will perhaps show that there is no bijection between N and
> {0, 1}^N. The proof can easily be adapted to show that there is no
> bijection between N and many sets.
>
On 13 Sep, 18:12, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Marty,
>
> >Could you please clarify to a non-mathematician why the
> > principle of excluded middle is so central to your thesis (hopefully
> > without using acronyms like AUDA, UD etc.).
>
> Without the excluded middle (A or not A), or with
On 13 Sep, 09:02, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 12 Sep 2009, at 16:42, Flammarion wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 11 Sep, 19:34, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> On 11 Sep 2009, at 17:45, Flammarion wrote:
>
> >> Once you say "yes" to the doctor, there is a clear sense in which
> >> "you" (that is your third per
5 matches
Mail list logo
