On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper:
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm
[mixed up question deleted]
I don't understand clearly your protocol.
On 26 Jan 2010, at 03:34, Brent Meeker wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper:
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm
Okay, first question: in step 5, assuming the
On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:16, Jack Mallah wrote:
Killing one man is not OK just because he has a brother.
In our context, the 'brother' has the same consciousness. From this I
conclude you would say no to the doctor. All right? The doctor
certainly kill a 'brother' .
Bruno Marchal
-- On Mon, 1/25/10, Stephen Paul King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Does not the mutual interfearence between the copies hace something to do
with a QM systems ability to compute exponensially more than a classical
system? If so, then reducing the number or density of copies would lead to an
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Jan 2010, at 03:34, Brent Meeker wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper:
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm
Okay, first question: in step
Hi Jack,
- Original Message -
From: Jack Mallah jackmal...@yahoo.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: Jack Mallah's paper on QS.
-- On Mon, 1/25/10, Stephen Paul King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Does not the mutual
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:16, Jack Mallah wrote:
Killing one man is not OK just because he has a brother.
In our context, the 'brother' has the same consciousness.
The brother most certainly does not have the same consciousness. If he
Thank you Jack for your response.
That one that is killed doesn't feel anything after he is killed. The one
that lives experiences whatever he would have experienced anyway. There is NO
TRANSFER of consciousness. Killing a guy (assuming he is not an evil guy or
in great pain) and not
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper:
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm
Are you OK with the first six steps.
Yup. 7 too.
It
9 matches
Mail list logo
