I'm not Bruno but here's my take:
1. The demands of those who use addictive/habituating substances are without
limit.
2. There is a finite limit to the number of attempts possible to deter
supply shipments.
3. Such attempts will always fall short as the futile waste of money/time
which they are.
4
Hi rand,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 8:56 AM, r wrote:
> I'm not Bruno but here's my take:
>
> 1. The demands of those who use addictive/habituating substances are
> without limit.
>
Surely that's not true? There is a finite amount of people with a finite
amount of time to consume drugs.
> 2. The
Hi Telmo,
Nobody knows logic. Marijuana illegality, and the whole prohibition
politics are based on error in the most elementary part of logic.
And formal logic, a branch of mathematics, is virtually known only
by professional logicians.
Sorry if this is off-topic, but I would love to
Hi Bruno,
Thank you for the detailed response. I was aware of most arguments up until
the self-referential machine part and, of course, agree with them. That part
I'm still digesting, although I believe I understand most of your argument
there.
I'm having a hard time understanding this particular
4 matches
Mail list logo
