On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On 9/4/2010 5:28 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
That still makes them physicalist theories, not quasi-physicalist. As
long as the mad scientist and his vats/computers are physical.
Does this mad scientist have free will,
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 3:13 PM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Brent and Rex:
after many many discussions I suffered along - reading utter stupidity,
Ouch!
this
one is a refreshingly reasonable one.
Excellent!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On 9/6/2010 6:45 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Brent Meekermeeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On 9/4/2010 5:28 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
That still makes them physicalist theories, not quasi-physicalist. As
long as the mad scientist and his vats/computers are
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On 9/6/2010 6:45 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
I would say that physicalism is the claim that *all* conscious
experiences are due to the independent existence of some other more
fundamental set of entities (particles, fields,
4 matches
Mail list logo
