On 16 Feb 2011, at 22:36, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/16/2011 12:33 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
hat matter adds to a bundle of properties is existence. A non-
existent bundle of properties is a mere concept, a mere possibility.
Thus the concept of matter is very much tied to the idea of
contingency
On 17 Feb 2011, at 04:39, Jason Resch wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:47 PM, m.a. marty...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Given modern physics and cosmology, does Nietzsche's idea of
eternal return have any validity?m.a.
--
In a few ways I think it could be argued that it does. One is the
Thanks Brent. But I am s bad in selling and advertizing. I might
make an attempt because I surely agree we should bring bridges between
religion and science, although I would say we should not build
bridges, but demolish instead the artificial wall we have build in
between science and
On Feb 16, 10:58 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:41 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 3:40 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:04 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 8:27 am, Jason Resch
1Z wrote:
Comp will imply that such a primary matter cannnot interfer at all
with your consciousness, so that IF comp is correct physics has to be
reduced to number theory, and such a primary matter is an invisible
epiphenomena.
Physics cannot be eliminated in favour of non existent
On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
Comp will imply that such a primary matter cannnot interfer at all
with your consciousness, so that IF comp is correct physics has to be
reduced to number theory, and such a primary matter is an invisible
Dear Bruno,
I wonder if you read my essay of 2000 Science - Religion upon which
Russell wrote in ire:
Don't you dare calling my science a religion! expressing similar (almost)
basis - not in the spirit of this list (or your particular stance), but
visualizing what I call 'conventional' science,
m.a. and Jason go into philosophy.
Firstly: eternal is not a time limit, not even with that questionable
figment of time we use in our imaging about our universe (for visualizing
a 'physical' system).
Secondly it does not seem so safe to step out from our restricted and widely
accepted solipsism
Dear John,
Dear Bruno,
I wonder if you read my essay of 2000 Science - Religion upon
which Russell wrote in ire:
Don't you dare calling my science a religion! expressing similar
(almost) basis - not in the spirit of this list (or your particular
stance), but visualizing what I call
On 2/17/2011 10:14 AM, benjayk wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjaykbenjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
Comp will imply that such a primary matter cannnot interfer at all
with your consciousness, so that IF comp is correct physics has to
On 2/17/2011 10:25 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Dear John,
Dear Bruno,
I wonder if you read my essay of 2000 Science - Religion upon which
Russell wrote in ire:
Don't you dare calling my science a religion! expressing similar
(almost) basis - not in the spirit of this list (or your particular
On Feb 17, 6:14 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
Comp will imply that such a primary matter cannnot interfer at all
with your consciousness, so that IF comp is correct physics
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
On 2/17/2011 10:14 AM, benjayk wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjaykbenjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
Comp will imply that such a primary matter cannnot interfer at all
with your consciousness, so that IF comp is
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 6:14 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
Comp will imply that such a primary matter cannnot interfer at
all
with your consciousness, so that IF comp is
On 2/17/2011 12:27 PM, benjayk wrote:
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
On 2/17/2011 10:14 AM, benjayk wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjaykbenjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
Comp will imply that such a primary matter cannnot interfer
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:06 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 10:58 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:41 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 3:40 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:04
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
On 2/17/2011 12:27 PM, benjayk wrote:
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
On 2/17/2011 10:14 AM, benjayk wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjaykbenjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
Comp will imply that such a
On Feb 17, 10:25 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:06 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 10:58 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:41 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 3:40 pm, Jason Resch
On Feb 17, 10:38 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
On 2/17/2011 12:27 PM, benjayk wrote:
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
On 2/17/2011 10:14 AM, benjayk wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjaykbenjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
Hi All,
Question: Why must Platonia exist?
Onward!
Stephen
“It is amazing what can be accomplished when nobody cares about who gets the
credit.”
Robert Yates
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send
Peter,
Correct me if I am wrong but I think we have established some things we
agree on:
Consciousness is informational
There are more ways to have disorder than order
Bayesian reasoning is a good approach in matters of truth
The universe could be a second old, and we would have no way of
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Stephen Paul King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
Hi All,
Question: Why must Platonia exist?
How many ways are there to arrange 4 people in a line? If you think the
answer 24 is true, regardless of any assumptions of axioms or set theory,
etc. then truth
On 2/17/2011 9:43 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@charter.net mailto:stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Hi All,
Question: Why must Platonia exist?
How many ways are there to arrange 4 people in a line? If you think
the answer 24
23 matches
Mail list logo
