It is interesting to note that the human psyche will break if cut off from
any sensory stimuli for more than about 48 hours. I don't believe this is
due to some philosophical need for a mind to be connected to its
environment, however, rather I would guess it is due to the design of the
neurons
An interesting video related to the discussion:
http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_gilbert_asks_why_are_we_happy.html
Interesting point: Lottery winners and those who become paraplegic have the
same level of happiness after a year.
Jason
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Rex Allen
On 19 Jun 2011, at 19:35, selva wrote:
On Jun 19, 5:21 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hi selva,
On 17 Jun 2011, at 22:10, selva wrote:
1.consider a person cut off from all his senses,all his 5 senses
shut
down and now he is about to find a solution for a problem. Does his
Bruno, I don't think I ever got your reply to my message below... I am
interested in your thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Terren
terren wrote:
Bruno,
I think that comp might imply that simple virgin (non programmed)
universal
(and immaterial) machine are already conscious. Perhaps even
Rex Allen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 6:08 PM, benjayk
benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
Rex Allen wrote:
If evolution by natural selection were correct, then it seems to me
that if the overall environment remained relatively stable for an
extended period of time - then
Jason Resch-2 wrote:
An interesting video related to the discussion:
http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_gilbert_asks_why_are_we_happy.html
Interesting point: Lottery winners and those who become paraplegic have
the
same level of happiness after a year.
A very interesting talk.
We tend
On Jun 20, 9:09 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
Jason Resch-2 wrote:
An interesting video related to the discussion:
http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_gilbert_asks_why_are_we_happy.html
Interesting point: Lottery winners and those who become paraplegic have
the
same
On Jun 20, 6:32 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 19 Jun 2011, at 19:35, selva wrote:
On Jun 19, 5:21 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hi selva,
On 17 Jun 2011, at 22:10, selva wrote:
1.consider a person cut off from all his senses,all his 5 senses
shut
2011/6/20 selva selvakr1...@gmail.com
On Jun 20, 6:32 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 19 Jun 2011, at 19:35, selva wrote:
On Jun 19, 5:21 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hi selva,
On 17 Jun 2011, at 22:10, selva wrote:
1.consider a person
by saying it does not occur in the situation i am describing..so it
does occur when our sense are present.in that case,it implies that our
thoughts are affecting the environment through our senses.now how is
that possible?senses are unidirectional. the situation i am describing
becomes
It does occur when you have interaction with the environment... your mind
obviously got feedback/input from the environment through the senses... so
if no input is given, how can the mind can interract with it.
And the mind act on the environment through the body. I don't know of any
instance of
On Jun 20, 10:57 pm, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
It does occur when you have interaction with the environment... your mind
obviously got feedback/input from the environment through the senses..
.and yes it got the input and is not getting the input.we can think of
only what we
I don't believe per se to what is coined by noetic science.
But that the study of consciousness is primary in a computational theory of
the mind, yes I do.
Quentin
2011/6/20 selva selvakr1...@gmail.com
On Jun 20, 10:57 pm, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
It does occur when you
On 6/20/2011 11:05 AM, selva wrote:
it is proved in noetic science that our thoughts(only thoughts and not
the actions due to those thoughts)affect our physical environment.
Where are these proofs published?
Brent
All those canes, braces and crutches, and not a single glass eye,
wooden
On 20.06.2011 21:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 6/20/2011 11:05 AM, selva wrote:
it is proved in noetic science that our thoughts(only thoughts and
not the actions due to those thoughts)affect our physical
environment.
Where are these proofs published?
I was trying to understand what
On 6/20/2011 12:59 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 20.06.2011 21:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 6/20/2011 11:05 AM, selva wrote:
it is proved in noetic science that our thoughts(only thoughts and
not the actions due to those thoughts)affect our physical
environment.
Where are these proofs
Two words: sharpshooter fallacy.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
On 20.06.2011 21:13 meekerdb said the following:
On 6/20/2011 11:05 AM, selva wrote:
it is proved in noetic science that our thoughts(only thoughts and
not the actions due to those
17 matches
Mail list logo
