On 23 Oct 2011, at 04:41, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:14:48PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
So the histories, we're agreed, are uncountable in number, but OMs
(bundles of histories compatible with the here and now) are surely
still countable.
This is not obvious for
Sthatis, thanks for your inserted remarks. Here is a condensed copy of them
to facilitate my reflection:
---
*10-24 Stathis reply entries:
=
We may not know all the physics behind the brain but we know there must be
some physics, even if undiscovered.
*I* *interjected some remarks just for keeping order on the list*.- *JM
*
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Oct 23, 4:14 pm, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
*Craig,*
**
*thanks for your explanation - B U T : let us accept the term
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you seriously suggesting that I can talk about an actual event without
there be a causal chain between the event and the sound that comes out of my
mouth?
You can talk about anything you want though. If I talk
On Oct 24, 9:38 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you seriously suggesting that I can talk about an actual event without
there be a causal chain between the event and the sound that comes out of
5 matches
Mail list logo
