On Dec 11, 6:05 pm, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
The question is - where is the consciousness in all this? I think it
must move with the levels - and given the UDA and COMP, I would say
that consciousness appears at the Multiverse level, not the single
universe level.
I
Hi!
On 12/12/2011 7:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Dec 11, 6:05 pm, Russell Standishli...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
The question is - where is the consciousness in all this? I think it
must move with the levels - and given the UDA and COMP, I would say
that consciousness appears at the
On 11 Dec 2011, at 19:24, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/11/2011 8:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Dec 2011, at 07:13, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/10/2011 3:50 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Some say that the interference of particles with themselves in
the two-slit experiment is amble evidence for these,
On 12 Dec 2011, at 00:05, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Dec 2011, at 07:23, Russell Standish wrote:
AFAICT, Maudlin's argument only works in a single universe
setting. What is inert in one universe, is alive and kicking in
On Dec 12, 9:05 am, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Hi!
On 12/12/2011 7:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Dec 11, 6:05 pm, Russell Standishli...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
The question is - where is the consciousness in all this? I think it
must move with the levels - and given
On 12 Dec 2011, at 04:39, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 09 Dec 2011, at 19:47, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
The heap argument was already done when I was
On 12/12/2011 4:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If recordings were conscious, wouldn't they evolve behind our backs?
Why would consciousness imply evolution? Evolution requires reproduction and differential
selection.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On 12/12/2011 12:36 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/12/2011 4:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If recordings were conscious, wouldn't they evolve behind our backs?
Why would consciousness imply evolution? Evolution requires
reproduction and differential selection.
Brent
Hi,
Reproduction and
On 12/12/2011 11:06 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 12/12/2011 12:36 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/12/2011 4:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If recordings were conscious, wouldn't they evolve behind our backs?
Why would consciousness imply evolution? Evolution requires reproduction and
differential
On 12/12/2011 2:51 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/12/2011 11:06 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 12/12/2011 12:36 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/12/2011 4:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If recordings were conscious, wouldn't they evolve behind our backs?
Why would consciousness imply evolution? Evolution
On Dec 12, 12:36 pm, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/12/2011 4:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If recordings were conscious, wouldn't they evolve behind our backs?
Why would consciousness imply evolution? Evolution requires reproduction and
differential
selection.
I was talking
On 12/12/2011 5:04 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Dec 12, 12:36 pm, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/12/2011 4:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If recordings were conscious, wouldn't they evolve behind our backs?
Why would consciousness imply evolution? Evolution requires reproduction
On Dec 12, 8:40 pm, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/12/2011 5:04 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Dec 12, 12:36 pm, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/12/2011 4:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If recordings were conscious, wouldn't they evolve behind our backs?
Why would
On 12/12/2011 6:28 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Dec 12, 8:40 pm, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/12/2011 5:04 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Dec 12, 12:36 pm, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.netwrote:
On 12/12/2011 4:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If recordings were conscious, wouldn't
14 matches
Mail list logo
