On 08 Feb 2012, at 17:27, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Since it is predictable, it is deterministic
Yes.
since it is determiniistic it is no free.
Cannot comment because your definition of free will was nonsensical
and the problem seems to be more
On 08 Feb 2012, at 18:47, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/8/2012 11:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Feb 2012, at 18:52, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Feb 6, 11:30 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
I think Quentin has a theory here, that you might be stupid.
Joseph Knight has another
On 2/9/2012 5:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Feb 2012, at 18:47, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/8/2012 11:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Feb 2012, at 18:52, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Feb 6, 11:30 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
I think Quentin has a theory here, that you
On 09 Feb 2012, at 13:20, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/9/2012 5:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Feb 2012, at 18:47, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/8/2012 11:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Feb 2012, at 18:52, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Feb 6, 11:30 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On Feb 8, 10:14 pm, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Whatever. If you subjectivise it completely. it is no longer
of interest.
That's because you aren't taking subjectivity seriously.
If I am very cold and I walk
into a room temperature room, to me the room feels warm. That isn't
2012/2/9 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
On Feb 8, 10:14 pm, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Whatever. If you subjectivise it completely. it is no longer
of interest.
That's because you aren't taking subjectivity seriously.
If I am very cold and I walk
into a room
Craig,
Sorry, I answered a paragraph to quickly. You raised a key question
which is at the crux of the mind-body problem, and its comp
reformulation.
On 09 Feb 2012, at 10:49, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Feb 2012, at 23:05, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I think that the 1p-sense that the machine
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
It [being free] means your actions are not determined by external forces
So a external force like light that has reflected off a wall does not
effect your actions and you crash into the wall. If that's what being free
means then I don't want
On 2/9/2012 9:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Feb 2012, at 13:20, Stephen P. King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
My best expression of my theory, although it does not quite rise
to that level, is in my last response to ACW under the subject line
Ontological problems of COMP. My claim is that your
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
How in hell would putting a computer in the position of the man prove
anything??
Because that is the position a computer is in when it runs a program
based on user inputs and outputs. The man in the room is a CPU.
On Feb 9, 9:49 am, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/2/9 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
How does a gear or lever have an opinion?
The problems with gears and levers is dumbness.
Does putting a billion gears and levers together in an arrangement
make them less
On 2/9/2012 3:40 PM, acw wrote:
On 2/8/2012 06:29, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi ACW,
I apologize for the length of this post, but I think that if I snipped
text that context would be lost that is necessary. Let us slow down a
bit. I think we are decohering a bit. ;-)
I should probably apologize
On Feb 9, 5:03 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
But free-will is often just meaning will, in some context of freedom.
It is a generalization of responsibility.
Yes.
I guess you understand the difference between a premeditated crime and
an non premeditated crime. A lawyer cannot
On Feb 9, 1:26 pm, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
How in hell would putting a computer in the position of the man prove
anything??
Because that is the position a computer is in when it runs a program
On 09 Feb 2012, at 17:43, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/9/2012 9:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Feb 2012, at 13:20, Stephen P. King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
My best expression of my theory, although it does not quite
rise to that level, is in my last response to ACW under the
subject
15 matches
Mail list logo
