On 12 Jun 2012, at 21:21, R AM wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
No. But the gangster does not know this determination. So although
at that level he could not do otherwise, from his perspective, it
still can make genuine sense that he
On 13 Jun 2012, at 00:38, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:17:38PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Jun 2012, at 00:47, Russell Standish wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 01:33:48PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
In fact we have p/p for any p. If you were correct we would
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:31:31 AM UTC+10, Brent wrote:
On 6/12/2012 4:40 PM, Pierz wrote:
I didn't say that we would all turn into self-deniers concerned only to
help others. I said we would achieve an optimal moral society. Such a
society would always bear in mind the absolute
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:08 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/12/2012 1:06 PM, R AM wrote:
Isn't that randomness?
No, it's unpredictablity - something we may fruitfully model by a
mathematical theory of randomness even though the dynamics are perfectly
deterministic, when we
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Yes, but for the sake of the argument, I wanted you to consider the case
where you are pretty certain about eating spaghetti. Defenders of free will
would say that free will is active whenever you make a decision,
On 12 Jun 2012, at 20:17, meekerdb wrote:
Here's a thoughtful blog on the meaning of theology. Bruno may want
to comment, since his conception of theology might answer the
questions put forward.
On 6/13/2012 12:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Jun 2012, at 00:38, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:17:38PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Jun 2012, at 00:47, Russell Standish wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 01:33:48PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
In fact we have
On 6/13/2012 1:57 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 12.06.2012 20:17 meekerdb said the following:
Here's a thoughtful blog on the meaning of theology. Bruno may want
to comment, since his conception of theology might answer the
questions put forward.
On 13 Jun 2012, at 10:44, R AM wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:08 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 6/12/2012 1:06 PM, R AM wrote:
Isn't that randomness?
No, it's unpredictablity - something we may fruitfully model by a
mathematical theory of randomness even though the
On 13 Jun 2012, at 15:14, R AM wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Yes, but for the sake of the argument, I wanted you to consider the
case where you are pretty certain about eating spaghetti. Defenders
of free will would say that free
On 13.06.2012 18:24 meekerdb said the following:
On 6/13/2012 1:57 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 12.06.2012 20:17 meekerdb said the following:
Here's a thoughtful blog on the meaning of theology. Bruno may
want to comment, since his conception of theology might answer
the questions put forward.
Stathis, semantics is a fundamental principle as long as we 'talk in wordly
terms'. Did you get a letter from God Almighty confirming that there is
nothing more FOR DECISIONMAKING than your brain and your environment? Sorry
to denigrate a term within your profession, but we know close to nothing
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:55 AM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Stathis, semantics is a fundamental principle as long as we 'talk in wordly
terms'. Did you get a letter from God Almighty confirming that there is
nothing more FOR DECISIONMAKING than your brain and your environment? Sorry
13 matches
Mail list logo
