On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
if you duplicated the entire city of Washington and sent one Bruno
Marchal to Washington1 and the other Bruno Marchal to Washington2 then
there would only be one Bruno Marchal having a Washington experience.
No problem with
The thread is about the possibility of an omnipotent being being able to
manipulate what is true.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everythinglisters,
First post here, and seems fun to get lost reading the discussions from
time to
Yup, so anything goes from there. But I fail to see anything convincingly
constructive, except maybe a few ideas for fiction, where everybody is
omnipotent god that can manipulate truth. So fiction section in bookstore
or Amazon?
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Brian Tenneson tenn...@gmail.com
On 7/4/2012 11:05 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
The thread is about the possibility of an omnipotent being being able to manipulate what
is true.
I guess I don't understand that. I can manipulate what's true. It's true I am sitting at
a computer - and I can stand up so it would be false. So
Hi,
It seems obvious that what is true, as referenced below, is some
kind of collection and that it's labeling can easily be seen to not be
fixed a priori. We might think of it of aKripke frame
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kripke_semantics and the models have
forced truths. The thing
5 matches
Mail list logo
