Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Telmo Menezes
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:27 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 1/2/2013 4:08 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: In my opinion, good and evil are just names we attach to brain processes we all have in common. These brain processes make us pursue the best interest of society instead of our own

Re: Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Telmo Menezes
Hi Roger, That's a bit surprising! On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote: Hi Telmo Menezes Then we pretty much agree. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] rclo...@verizon.net] 1/2/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Telmo Menezes
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: On 02 Jan 2013, at 13:08, Telmo Menezes wrote: In my opinion, good and evil are just names we attach to brain processes we all have in common. These brain processes make us pursue the best interest of society instead of

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Bruno Marchal IMHO Good is no more arbitrary than life is. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/3/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-01-02, 14:55:31

Re: Re: Re: Re: The two basic theologies

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Craig Weinberg Enhancing Life is not a very arbitrary value, but of course interpreting what that means can differ from person to person. That's why we have laws, either religious or legal ones. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/3/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the

Re: Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Craig Weinberg Do you know anything about jurisprudence ? It doesn't care if your motivations were good or evil, it only cares if you broke the law or not. Serial killers are generally thought to be sociopaths, but they don't usually have much success cooking up an insanity defense. They are

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Chemotherapy is generally thought to be evil to the cancer (it tries to kill it) and good to the patient (it tries ultimately to cure him through killing the cancer). While chemotherapy works against the cancer, on the other hand, Christian believers such as me believe that the holy spirit, if

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Craig Weinberg Tsunamis and other forces of nature are themselves amoral*, but their effects can be good (enhance life) or evil (diminish life). *Since God causes everything to happen, he also, although reluctantly (the theological term is God's permissive will) mustl cause evil to happen as

What Hell is like

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Craig Weinberg It doesn't matter whether you have good or bad intentions. The law and God judge us by what we do. You do the crime, you do the time. You sin, you go to Hell. Personally, I believe that the eternal torture of Hell is not to be able to feel God's love and forgiveness. That

Re: Re: Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Craig Weinberg If you jump off of a building, gravity will kill you. Is that God's fault ? IMHO since God created nature, he also created the natural forces, which cause tsunamis. God is lawful, so He follows his own natural laws. Crap happens down here. We aren't yet in Heaven. [Roger

Re: Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 5:35:00 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Hi Craig Weinberg Do you know anything about jurisprudence ? Only as much as you do. It doesn't care if your motivations were good or evil, it only cares if you broke the law or not. Did I contradict that somewhere?

Re: What Hell is like

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 6:06:42 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Hi Craig Weinberg It doesn't matter whether you have good or bad intentions. The law and God judge us by what we do. You do the crime, you do the time. I'll let the Bible speak for itself, if that is the God you are

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 5:53:56 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Hi Craig Weinberg Tsunamis and other forces of nature are themselves amoral*, but their effects can be good (enhance life) or evil (diminish life). Are you saying that God is powerless to change nature? *Since God

A simple explanation of Sheldrake's morphic resonance observations

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Sheldrake's morphic resonance is based on observations such as this: repeated operations by people doing the same times crossword puzzle cause subsequent solving of the puzzle later in the day easier. This is ridiculed by scientists. But IMHO morphic resonance could be understood as

Re: Re: Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Craig Weinberg Evil is not defined by law, but crime is. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/3/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Craig Weinberg Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-01-03, 08:12:58

Re: Re: What Hell is like

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Craig Weinberg All of your quotes are very good advice. What's your point ? [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/3/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Craig Weinberg Receiver: everything-list Time:

Re: Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Craig Weinberg Whatever the Bible says. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/3/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Craig Weinberg Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-01-03, 08:55:02 Subject: Re: Re: The

Re: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Stephen P. King 1) I dobn't know what you mean by subjective. Things happen. Crap happens. 2). You seem to have some incorrect ideas about Leibniz. Leibniz in no way pretended that he created a perfect system. The world is far from perfect. All L did suggest is that God did the best job

Re: The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
On 1/3/2013 9:30 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King 1) I dobn't know what you mean by subjective. Things happen. Crap happens. 2). You seem to have some incorrect ideas about Leibniz. Leibniz in no way pretended that he created a perfect system. The world is far from perfect. All L did

Re: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Stephen P. King I suppose that you're referring to the cpre-established perfect harmony, which makes it seem as if everything we do is determined (by God). IMHO that only means that God knows what we will do, not make the decision for us. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/3/2013

Re: A simple explanation of Sheldrake's morphic resonance observations

2013-01-03 Thread John Clark
I have a even simpler explanation of Sheldrake's morphic resonance observations, Rupert Sheldrake is a simpleton and a crappy scientist. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi meekerdb The world down here isn't heaven, yes, but there still is a Heaven for the afterlife, IMHO. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/3/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: meekerdb Receiver:

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi meekerdb Although a brilliant logician, Russell was far left (no doubt a communist and so anti-christian). His diatribe against Christianity is a prime example. It's totally misinformed and mistaken. Ethics is, at bottom, loving your neighbor as your self. [Roger Clough],

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Telmo Menezes
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote: Hi meekerdb Although a brilliant logician, Russell was far left (no doubt a communist and so anti-christian). His diatribe against Christianity is a prime example. It's totally misinformed and mistaken. Ethics is, at

Re: A simple explanation of Sheldrake's morphic resonance observations

2013-01-03 Thread Telmo Menezes
Hi Roger, I'm curious about the experimental setup. Could it be that he's just misinterpreting a probabilistic distribution? Suppose the amount of time it takes people to solve a puzzle follows a normal distribution. As time passes and we ride the slope to the mean, we can get the mistaken

a Sheldrake computer:: the universe as a random + mechanism--- habit computer

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Richard Ruquist My understanding of Sheldrake's results suggests to me that the universe is not like a deterministic great computer, or if it is, the deterministic or mechanical part acts like a filter to incline random motions to more regular ones which Sheldrake calls habits or morphic

Re: Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Telmo Menezes I suffer from chronic depression, and so have the same problem, in which case I try to act according to principles. My main belief is that whoever comes to me is my neighbor. So I keep a few dollars in my wallet to give to beggars in the street. [Roger Clough],

Re: a Sheldrake computer:: the universe as a random + mechanism--- habit computer

2013-01-03 Thread Richard Ruquist
Hi Roger Clough, Nova Spivack has two linked blogs following the one I copied below in which he argues that since consciousness is not computable, something he takes for granted, then consciousness must be even more fundamental than spacetime. You might find it of interest to read all three

Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.

2013-01-03 Thread Richard Ruquist
Roger, How are morphic fields related to monads? Richard On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote: Hi Telmo Menezes Sheldrake's been criticized in such a fashion for many of his results (there are a huge number of other types of observations) but I simply

Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.

2013-01-03 Thread Telmo Menezes
Thanks Roger! I'm intrigued and will investigate further when time permits. Another more mundane explanation might be related to the effect of knowing that something is possible. I believe there is some research on this effect. In sports, for example, when someone breaks a psychological barrier

Monads and Sheldrake

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Richard Ruquist Sheldrake says that, if I remember properly, monads are a combination of mind and body, so are mindbrains. The perceptions of these in turn reflect all of the perceptions of all of the other monads in the universe, so the universe is a giant mindbrain. Then there is a

Re: Monads and Sheldrake

2013-01-03 Thread Richard Ruquist
Roger, But how do morphic fields fit in with this scheme of things? Richard On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote: Hi Richard Ruquist Sheldrake says that, if I remember properly, monads are a combination of mind and body, so are mindbrains. The perceptions

Re: Re: a Sheldrake computer:: the universe as a random + mechanism---habit computer

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Richard Ruquist Sheldrake and leibniz would offer a more shocking picture, namely that strings, like all matter, are alive. But Gates is to be congratulated for excaping from the cult of materialism. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/3/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near

Re: Re: Monads and Sheldrake

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Richard Ruquist They rule everything. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/3/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Richard Ruquist Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-01-03, 11:48:05 Subject: Re: Monads

Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 10:44:17 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Hi Telmo Menezes Sheldrake's been criticized in such a fashion for many of his results (there are a huge number of other types of observations) but I simply trust that he's not deceiving us. My reason is that materialists

Re: Re: Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 9:04:39 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Hi Craig Weinberg Evil is not defined by law, but crime is. I ask again, Did I contradict that somewhere? [Roger Clough], [rcl...@verizon.net] javascript: 1/3/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end.

Re: Re: What Hell is like

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 9:11:29 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Hi Craig Weinberg All of your quotes are very good advice. What's your point ? My point is that any worthwhile religion is very much concerned with intentions and the content of your 'heart', at least as much as whether

Re: Re: Why bad things happen to good people--Leibniz's Theodicy

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 6:14:41 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Hi Craig Weinberg If you jump off of a building, gravity will kill you. Is that God's fault ? IMHO since God created nature, he also created the natural forces, which cause tsunamis. God is lawful, so He follows his own

Re: a Sheldrake computer:: the universe as a random + mechanism--- habit computer

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 10:45:01 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote: BTW my stichk is that consciousness comes from discrete compactified space that is arithmetic, in both the megaverse and in each universe. Richard Why would consciousness come from discrete compactified space? To me, all

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 02 Jan 2013, at 20:13, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:57:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 02 Jan 2013, at 02:01, Craig Weinberg wrote: Chemotherapy Good or Evil? Better than nothing for most people having some disease. Worst than THC injection, plausibly

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 02 Jan 2013, at 20:27, meekerdb wrote: On 1/2/2013 4:08 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: In my opinion, good and evil are just names we attach to brain processes we all have in common. These brain processes make us pursue the best interest of society instead of our own self- interest. I

Re: Re: Re: Re: The two basic theologies

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 5:22:24 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Hi Craig Weinberg Enhancing Life is not a very arbitrary value, I don't know about arbitrary, but it is a very nebulous value. What does the enhancement of life consist of? The growth of bacteria? The improvement of the

Re: The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-03 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 02 Jan 2013, at 20:31, meekerdb wrote: On 1/2/2013 5:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Leibniz's view, in his theodicy , which I hold to also, is that the world down here, that God created, is necessarily imperfect, so, as they say crap happens. This is because things can't be good everywhere

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 12:16:36 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 02 Jan 2013, at 20:13, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:57:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 02 Jan 2013, at 02:01, Craig Weinberg wrote: Chemotherapy Good or Evil? Better than nothing

Re: Galileo, Inchofer, and Popper

2013-01-03 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 02 Jan 2013, at 21:01, meekerdb wrote: On 1/2/2013 10:34 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: A nice quote from Galileo by John L. Heilbron that shows: 1) One could trace the falsifiability to Jesuits of Galileo's time. 2) It could be a link between falsifiability and theology. p. 318 ‘However,

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread meekerdb
On 1/3/2013 12:57 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: Isn't it supported by, In the long term, the DNA of the species as more chances of thriving if the individuals are altruistic to a degree. Maybe, if you're willing to wait a couple million years for biological evolution to catch up with

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread meekerdb
On 1/3/2013 2:44 AM, Roger Clough wrote: While chemotherapy works against the cancer, on the other hand, Christian believers such as me believe that the holy spirit, if so requested, can fill you with life and so defeat a cancer by that means. Hmmm. I guess my friend Dan, who is a devout

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 5:44:32 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Chemotherapy is generally thought to be evil to the cancer (it tries to kill it) and good to the patient (it tries ultimately to cure him through killing the cancer). While chemotherapy works against the cancer, on the

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 02 Jan 2013, at 21:46, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 3:05:10 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: On 1/2/2013 11:13 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:57:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 02 Jan 2013, at 02:01, Craig Weinberg wrote: Chemotherapy

Re: What Hell is like

2013-01-03 Thread meekerdb
On 1/3/2013 5:47 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: Personally, I believe that the eternal torture of Hell is not to be able to feel God's love and forgiveness. That would be Hell to a Jesus. He refers to being tossed out and undergoing a weeping and gnashing of teeth. Heaven and

Re: What Hell is like

2013-01-03 Thread meekerdb
Or But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. --- Jesus, Luke 19:27 On 1/3/2013 6:11 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Craig Weinberg All of your quotes are very good advice. What's your point ? [Roger Clough],

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread meekerdb
On 1/3/2013 7:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi meekerdb Although a brilliant logician, Russell was far left (no doubt a communist and so anti-christian). He was anti-communist too. His diatribe against Christianity is a prime example. It's certainly a prime example of his brilliance and

Rupert Sheldrake - The Morphogenetic Universe

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Rupert Sheldrake - The Morphogenetic Universe What is space ? There is no such thing as space, there are only fields, which are mathematical structures. What is matter ? There is no such thing as matter, because it is only a field. There is no such thing as mass, which is why there

Re: Re: What Hell is like

2013-01-03 Thread John Clark
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote: Hi Craig Weinberg All of your quotes are very good advice. Do you also think that God gave good advice 1 Samuel 15:2-3? Thus saith the LORD of hosts ... go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and

Re: The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-03 Thread Richard Ruquist
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: On 02 Jan 2013, at 20:31, meekerdb wrote: On 1/2/2013 5:21 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Leibniz's view, in his theodicy , which I hold to also, is that the world down here, that God created, is necessarily imperfect, so,

Re: Re: Monads and Sheldrake

2013-01-03 Thread Richard Ruquist
Morphic fields are your god??? On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote: Hi Richard Ruquist They rule everything. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/3/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following

Re: Rupert Sheldrake - The Morphogenetic Universe

2013-01-03 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 1:14:15 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Rupert Sheldrake - The Morphogenetic Universe What is space ? Space is the experience of gaps between public presences, or alternatively the distance which can be measured of one object against another. There is no such

Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.

2013-01-03 Thread Richard Ruquist
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, January 3, 2013 10:44:17 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Hi Telmo Menezes Sheldrake's been criticized in such a fashion for many of his results (there are a huge number of other types of observations) but I

Re: Galileo, Inchofer, and Popper

2013-01-03 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 02.01.2013 21:01 meekerdb said the following: On 1/2/2013 10:34 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: A nice quote from Galileo by John L. Heilbron that shows: 1) One could trace the falsifiability to Jesuits of Galileo's time. 2) It could be a link between falsifiability and theology. p. 318

Re: The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
On 1/3/2013 9:59 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King I suppose that you're referring to the cpre-established perfect harmony, which makes it seem as if everything we do is determined (by God). IMHO that only means that God knows what we will do, not make the decision for us. Hi

Re: Monads and Sheldrake

2013-01-03 Thread meekerdb
Don't be so narrow-minded. You must also incorporate Orgone, Feng Shui, Qi, ectoplasma, the astral plane, and NDE's. Nevermind those piddling rational, mechanistic, material problems like global warming, overpopulation, lack of water, depletion of oil... Brent There are those who claim that

The monadology is an extended reference on morphic forms.

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Leibniz's monads = substances refer to phenomenological bodies which are of one part, that is to say, that have no internal boundaries. So his monads are morphic forms. If you study the nature of his monads, (through his monadology) you can learn more about the morphic fields from his

Deutsch on TIQM

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
Hi, I found an interesting passage in http://www.labyrinthina.com/multiverse.htm Another disguised many worlds theory, says Deutsch, is John Cramer's transactional interpretation in which information passes backwards and forwards through time. When you measure the position of an atom,

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
On 1/3/2013 10:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net mailto:rclo...@verizon.net wrote: Hi meekerdb Although a brilliant logician, Russell was far left (no doubt a communist and so anti-christian). His diatribe against

Re: a Sheldrake computer:: the universe as a random + mechanism--- habit computer

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
On 1/3/2013 10:22 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Richard Ruquist My understanding of Sheldrake's results suggests to me that the universe is not like a deterministic great computer, or if it is, the deterministic or mechanical part acts like a filter to incline random motions to more regular ones

Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.

2013-01-03 Thread Russell Standish
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 01:46:20PM -0500, Richard Ruquist wrote: While you may investigate such things you will be at a loss to publish them except on the internet. Even the Cornell internet archives arXiv.com refuses to publish such results or such thinking. The last person to get such

Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
On 1/3/2013 10:47 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote: Roger, How are morphic fields related to monads? Richard Hi, May I attempt an answer? Monads are not entities that are localized in a place, they are entire fields of experience. Morphic fields are a way to think of how monads synchronize and

Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.

2013-01-03 Thread Richard Ruquist
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote: Morphic fields are a way to think of how monads synchronize and reflect their histories with each others using a substance based model Stephan, Could you elaborate? Richard -- You received this message because you

Re: Conputer Code In String Theory Supersimetric Equations

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
On 1/3/2013 12:46 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: It would still be amazing that nature use quantum correcting machinery at some fundamental level. That might be explainable with comp. The measure on the computational histories can be made higher if there are fundamental instructions for hunting the

Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
On 1/3/2013 1:01 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Thursday, January 3, 2013 5:44:32 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: Chemotherapy is generally thought to be evil to the cancer (it tries to kill it) and good to the patient (it tries ultimately to cure him through killing the cancer). While

Fwd: [FOM] Preprint: Topological Galois Theory

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
Hi Bruno, You might be interested in this! Original Message Subject:[FOM] Preprint: Topological Galois Theory Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:08:04 +0100 From: Olivia Caramello oc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk Reply-To: Foundations of Mathematics f...@cs.nyu.edu To:

Re: Fwd: [FOM] Preprint: Topological Galois Theory

2013-01-03 Thread meekerdb
On 1/3/2013 5:06 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: Hi Bruno, You might be interested in this! How about giving us a 500 word summary including an example of it's application. Brent Original Message Subject:[FOM] Preprint: Topological Galois Theory Date: Thu, 3

Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
On 1/3/2013 7:33 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote: Morphic fields are a way to think of how monads synchronize and reflect their histories with each others using a substance based model Stephan, Could you elaborate? Richard

A paranormal prediction for the next year

2013-01-03 Thread John Clark
I have been a member of the Extropian List for many years and at the beginning of the year it is my habit to send a message to that list about the paranormal and psi. Sense the subject of Rupert Sheldrake and other forms of infantile junk science has come up here I thought I'd send it to this list

Re: A paranormal prediction for the next year

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen P. King
Hi, So how ever many years ago you there confident that CERN would discover the Higgs? And this post proves? Pfft, do better, John. On 1/3/2013 11:29 PM, John Clark wrote: I have been a member of the Extropian List for many years and at the beginning of the year it is my habit to

A Summary of Peirce, Leibniz and Sheldrake on habits

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
A Summary of Peirce, Leibniz and Sheldrake on habits Habits are the results of of the taming of random ensembles -- Leibniz states that there are two kinds of logic, a) necessary logic, which is always true (the timeless logic of Heaven

On morphic telepathy

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
On morphic telepathy Note that Leibniz for good reasons (similar to Kant) did not consider time and space to be substances, so the monads all exist as a dust of points in an inextended domain (to use Descartes' concepts) which is by definition outside of spacetime (is in mental domain).

The self-taming of the universe

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
IMHO Sheldrake's morphic fields are organizing fields which result in the self-taming or organization of random fields. So they are anti-entropic or energy-forming. We see such taming in the formation of planets from swirling dust particles, in the formation of tornadoes, and in the

Re: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Russell Standish Most scientific publications are based on the 19th century religious cult of materialism, which dogmatically rejects mind and spirit for atheistic purposes (not reasons, there are none). It cannot deal with fields at all, for example the theory of relativity, since

Re: Re: a Sheldrake computer:: the universe as a random + mechanism---habit computer

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Stephen P. King Entanglement is a major part of Sheldrake's ideas, which also allow for fields within fields, you might be happy to know. The fields can be mental and social fields, And includes resonance between fields such as telepathy.. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/4/2013

Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Stephen P. King The only miracle that the holy spirit can work with is life, for it, like God, is life, or represents life. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/4/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following content -

Re: Re: The best of all possible Worlds.

2013-01-03 Thread Roger Clough
Hi meekerb, Heaven is not part of contingent creation, so your statement that there is no heaven is illogical or irrelevant. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 1/4/2013 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: