On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, September 13, 2013 5:31:40 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
wrote:
Which reasoning is clearly false?
Here's what I'm thinking:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday, September 13, 2013 5:31:40 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Craig Weinberg
Leibniz, Idealism and Parapsychology
Since it is often based on laboratory experiments, parapsychology has a
scientific basis. But these results
are smeared by proponents of the cult of materialism, which cannot accept the
view that there is such a
thing as a mind (a Self). That alone makes
One idea I have been kicking around, is viewing through physics, that yes mind
is bran, brain is mind, but not totally. More, precisely, the notion that the
data, the pattern identity, the mind, the soul, personality, memory (whatever
we wish to call it) is analogous to a computer network,
Hi spudboy100
Sure.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
- Receiving the following content -
From: spudboy100
Receiver: everything-list,rclough
Time: 2013-09-14, 10:01:02
Subject: Re: Leibniz,
Well, its just an idea that fascinates me. Reading Gerhard t'Hooft in the
1990's sort of set it all in motion. Also Raphael Bousso, in their analysis oh
the universe as hologram, etc. Are we the chuck of matter, or the reflection in
the mirror? That kind of thing.
-Original Message-
6 matches
Mail list logo
