On 03 Nov 2013, at 19:46, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
So you sees both Moscow AND Washington.
No, anyone of the two see only one city.
So what is the one and only one city that the 2 you see.
W for tham in W. And M
On 03 Nov 2013, at 18:51, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 03 Nov 2013, at 09:17, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 02 Nov 2013, at 20:11, Jason Resch wrote:
On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:43, meekerdb wrote:
On 11/3/2013 1:11 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Nov 2013, at 21:47, meekerdb wrote:
On 11/2/2013 10:53 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Quentin Anciaux
allco...@gmail.com wrote:
You have been duplicated so there are TWO
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:36 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/3/2013 3:17 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:51 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/3/2013 10:49 AM, John Clark wrote:
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is considered by many to be a
Well reasoned opportunism taken literally still remains what it is. I don't
reason against it and nature has good reason for these tendencies locally.
My main problem is that I just can't picture myself around a bunch of Rand
fans licking their fingers greed is good, keep deregulating all things
Here is a discussion of how greed is in the process of destroying our fiat
currency banking system:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-entire-fiat-money-system-is-bankrupt-demise-of-the-global-us-fiat-dollar-reserve-currency/5356491
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
Well reasoned opportunism taken literally still remains what it is. I don't
reason against it and nature has good reason for these tendencies locally.
Yes, but one has to be careful about global narratives.
Ryle's category mistake and why spacetime, to a platonist, is contained in
Mind.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_mistake
This is a very subtle issue.
The term category-mistake was introduced by Gilbert Ryle in his book The
Concept of Mind (1949)
to remove what he argued to be a
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
Furthermore, her point is that competition in a free market actually
helps everybody -- by providing better goods and services at lower
prices -- while redistribution of money based on violence does not,
and is in
What do you do if your Obamacare is too expensive ?
No matter what your age, most people will find Obamacare
way too expensive. But there's no penalty for a pre-existing illness.
So most people are going to dodge the bullet, take the
penalty, and just wait until they get sick.
That changes the
On Nov 4, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 03 Nov 2013, at 18:51, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 03 Nov 2013, at 09:17, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Bruno Marchal
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
Well reasoned opportunism taken literally still remains what it is. I
don't
reason against it and nature has good reason for
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com wrote:
LOL -- totally -- who exactly is this undefined many that considers
Scalia to be an intellectual?
According to Wikipedia Scalia has been described as the intellectual
anchor of the Court's conservative wing, and it makes sense
What will happen is that the focus of the right wing extremists in the
US on sabotaging the health care law, will lead to a Hillary being
elected in 2016, a Democratic controlled House of Representatives and a
fillibuster proof Democratic majority in the Senate. And that with a
strong left
On 04 Nov 2013, at 15:57, Jason Resch wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 03 Nov 2013, at 18:51, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 03 Nov 2013, at 09:17, Jason Resch wrote:
On
The Heritage Foundation
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
*What do you do if your Obamacare is too expensive ? *
No matter what your age, most people will find Obamacare
way too expensive. But there's no penalty for a pre-existing illness.
So most
On 04 Nov 2013, at 16:20, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Telmo Menezes
te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
Well reasoned opportunism taken literally still remains what it
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 04 Nov 2013, at 15:57, Jason Resch wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 03 Nov 2013, at 18:51, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Bruno Marchal
On 04 Nov 2013, at 18:53, Jason Resch wrote:
It looks like Zeh had more to say in 1999, this theory seems much
closer to many dreams: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-minds_interpretation
#Continuous_infinity_of_minds and http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9908084
Continuous infinity
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 04 Nov 2013, at 16:20, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com
On 11/4/2013 4:10 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
Well reasoned opportunism taken literally still remains what it is. I don't
reason against it and nature has good reason for these tendencies locally.
Yes, but
Surely someone has to drag the US (no doubt whingeing about how awful it is
that the rich should provide the poor with even a rudimentary level of
health care) into 1948 eventually?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To
On 11/4/2013 1:06 PM, LizR wrote:
Surely someone has to drag the US (no doubt whingeing about how awful it is that the
rich should provide the poor with even a rudimentary level of health care) into 1948
eventually?
1948? Hell, Bismarck brought universal healthcare to Germany in 1890.
Brent
Fair enough! I only knew about the UK for sure.
It's ridiculous to consider a country that doesn't provide some basic level
of healthcare and other safety nets to every citizen as part of the First
World.
On 5 November 2013 10:17, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/4/2013 1:06 PM,
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
Well reasoned opportunism taken
In the US they waited too long and they now have a very inefficient
system, they pay twice as much per capita compared to most other
Western countries for healthcare. But then that also means that you now
have this huge health care industry in the US comprising of insurance
companies, private
Yes. This is also true of various other problems with US society (some of
them not just in the US).
On 5 November 2013 11:22, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
In the US they waited too long and they now have a very inefficient
system, they pay twice as much per capita compared to most other Western
As Telmo indicated , Rand, railed against unlimited state power, which is what
Marxism and Fascism are all about. Her individualism, stuff is central to her
philosophy, but breaks down to the argument that being forced to donate is no
donation at all, but extortion from unlimited state power.
I'm not sure I can parse your last sentence. To start with you seem to
indicate that Marxism (the economic theory / desire for rule by the
proletariat) - interestingly in lumped with Fascism (rule by a powerful
state) - might get people killed. But in the last sentence you say this is
a wrong
On 11/4/2013 4:31 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
As Telmo indicated , Rand, railed against unlimited state power, which is what Marxism
and Fascism are all about. Her individualism, stuff is central to her philosophy, but
breaks down to the argument that being forced to donate is no donation at
On 11/4/2013 4:44 PM, LizR wrote:
I'm not sure I can parse your last sentence. To start with you seem to indicate that
Marxism (the economic theory / desire for rule by the proletariat) - interestingly in
lumped with Fascism (rule by a powerful state) - might get people killed. But in the
last
Ah, good point. I have even seen The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui. I
should have remembered.
So basically America (and various other Western democracies) currently have
fascist governments - the twist being that this time around, hardly anyone
realises the fact!
On 5 November 2013 14:10,
On 11/4/2013 5:22 PM, LizR wrote:
Ah, good point. I have even seen The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui. I should have
remembered.
So basically America (and various other Western democracies) currently have fascist
governments - the twist being that this time around, hardly anyone realises the
So just corporatism, then?
Although there is a lot of superorganism worship and desire for national
glory in the US, and a strong desire to conquer inferior and backward
nations - often by commercial rather than military means. Plus paying lip
service to individualism doesn't seem to contradict
As far as I - as a newspaper-reading stiff - know - it was Mitt Romney,
not exactly as it was implemented - asked for by the dying late Sen. Ed.
Kennedy at his last visit to Congress. Obama only kept the basic
(capitalist?) format to let insurers and other investors (and lawyers) reap
profit on
I would put marxism and fascism close together and not polar opposites.
Because Marxists claim that they are for the proles does not really
mean that they are. It just means that they try to BS people with this
claim. In fact, there are no, non mixed economies anymore, in the us,
china, and
Briefly, tea baggers want a more limited govt cost wise. Roll things
back to the 2005,2007 annual budget. We also want the Constition
upheld. Hayek is well liked by the Tea baggers, road to sefdom was
passed around.
-Original Message-
From: meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
To:
On 11/4/2013 8:15 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Briefly, tea baggers want a more limited govt cost wise.
Why? What do you want to cut? the military? (not according the signs I see at rallies)
Welfare to the unfortunate? Support for education? Social security? Medicare? In other
words
On 5 November 2013 17:11, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
I would put marxism and fascism close together and not polar opposites.
Because Marxists claim that they are for the proles does not really mean
that they are. It just means that they try to BS people with this claim. In
fact, there are no,
39 matches
Mail list logo
