The Ilusion of Branching and the MWI

AFAIK, no one has ever observed a probability wave, from which I conclude the wave function has only epistemic content. So I have embraced the "shut up and calculate" interpretation of the wave function. I also see a connection between the True Believers of the MWI, and Trump sycophants; they

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

Ah, thanks professor. Do we send Curiosity on Mars for a buzz? Your question is close to the question “what is the meaning of life?”. Is a baby useful? And for what? Would the human species have survived without nature endowing reproduction with some buzz? Yes, for the space scientists.

Re: The Ilusion of Branching and the MWI

On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 10:00:58 PM UTC, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > Do you really think that using your words, insults and so on will convince > anyone? > *No, of course not They're beyond being effected by simple logic, or common sense, which became extinct not so long ago. They can't

Re: The Ilusion of Branching and the MWI

Do you really think that using your words, insults and so on will convince anyone? How old are you? C'est ridicule. Le sam. 4 août 2018 à 23:32, a écrit : > AFAIK, no one has ever observed a probability wave, from which I conclude > the wave function has only epistemic content. So I have

Decoherence Theory according to Schlosshauer

As long as the universe is not resolved into individual subsystems *(that is, no tensor decomposition of the WF)*, there is no measurement problem. IMO, highly doubtful, or minimally outside the domain of quantum theory where there is such a thing as measurements, and thus the dualism being

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 3 Aug 2018, at 23:36, spudboy100 via Everything List > wrote: > > An apt question (for me) is how knowing that we dwell within a Diophantine > equation help matters? The goal is just to search the truth. Now, does searching the truth helps? That is not entirely obvious, and we all

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 4 Aug 2018, at 12:52, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > From: Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> >> >> Honestly you fail to convince me of any physical influence at a distance >> brought by Bell’s inequality violation when studied in the MW. >> Bell and Aspect works remain for me only

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 4 Aug 2018, at 03:09, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > From: Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> >>> On 3 Aug 2018, at 13:43, Bruce Kellett >> > wrote: >>> >>> From: Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> On 2 Aug 2018, at 12:54, Bruce Kellett >>>

Re: Combinators 1 (Introduction)

On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 2:19 PM Bruno Marchal wrote: > Hi Jason, people, > > Hi Bruno, Thank you for this. I've been trying to digest it over the past few days. > > I will send my post on the Church-Turing thesis and incompleteness later. > It is too long. > > So, let us proceed with the

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 3 Aug 2018, at 19:24, John Clark wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Bruno Marchal > wrote: > > >>The problem is neither FTL influences nor the creation of Many Worlds > >>violates the know laws of physics > > > >FTL influences violate any minimally