On 1/14/2019 3:22 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
The physics comes from the first person statistical interference
between those dreams.
Where can this "person" be to make a statisical inference, if there are
only the dreams?
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 5:22:16 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 13 Jan 2019, at 21:08, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> My only link here is to my notebook:
> https://codicalist.wordpress.com/contents/
> 102 notes so far. What I've though of is there somewhere.
>
>
> But in
On 1/14/2019 4:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Jan 2019, at 21:33, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 1/13/2019 6:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Jan 2019, at 20:51, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 1/11/2019 2:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I suspect Planck constant to be not computable, because if we
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 4:58:52 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 10:27:19 AM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 2:53:53 AM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 10:27:19 AM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 2:53:53 AM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 6:12:43 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/13/2019 9:51 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 11:41:15 PM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 4:58:52 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 10:27:19 AM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 2:53:53 AM
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 5:52:39 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 11:41:15 PM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 4:58:52 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 12:10:23 AM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 5:52:39 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 11:41:15 PM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 4:58:52 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZX_XCYokQo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 6:12:43 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/13/2019 9:51 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> This means, to me, that the arbitrary phase angles have absolutely no
> effect on the resultant interference pattern which is observed. But isn't
> this what the phase
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 6:12:43 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/13/2019 9:51 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> This means, to me, that the arbitrary phase angles have absolutely no
> effect on the resultant interference pattern which is observed. But isn't
> this what the phase
> On 13 Jan 2019, at 21:33, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/13/2019 6:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> On 11 Jan 2019, at 20:51, Brent Meeker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2019 2:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I suspect Planck constant to be not computable, because if we extract QM
On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 6:36:55 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM Lawrence Crowell <
> goldenfield...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>> On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 4:51:24 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 9:29 AM Lawrence Crowell <
>>>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 2:03 AM Russell Standish
wrote:
*> The Planck constant is, like the speed of light c, a unit conversion
> factor. In natural units, it is 1 (or at least ℏ is set to 1).*
That just restates the mystery using different words because natural units
are based on physical
On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 2:53:53 AM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 6:12:43 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/13/2019 9:51 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> This means, to me, that the arbitrary phase angles have absolutely no
>> effect on
> On 13 Jan 2019, at 21:08, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 9:22:00 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 11 Jan 2019, at 23:36, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 8:41:19 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 11 Jan
16 matches
Mail list logo
