On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:29 PM Mason Green wrote:
>
> *> Here’s another idea I just came up with, that doesn’t harness dark
> energy itself so much as the Hawking radiation of the de Sitter horizon.A
> civilization could build a sphere around a cold black hole (I.e., a
> rotating or charged
Here’s another idea I just came up with, that doesn’t harness dark energy
itself so much as the Hawking radiation of the de Sitter horizon.
A civilization could build a sphere around a cold black hole (I.e., a rotating
or charged black hole whose Hawking temperature is lower than that of the
On Monday, April 8, 2019 at 4:03:19 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:29 PM Mason Green > wrote:
>
>
>>
>> *> Here’s another idea I just came up with, that doesn’t harness dark
>> energy itself so much as the Hawking radiation of the de Sitter horizon.A
>> civilization
Why the cosmological horizon? The CMB is at 2.7degK, which is waaay
hotter than any black hole you're likely to find. So you can just put
a heat engine between the CMB and the BH.
Brent
On 4/8/2019 12:29 PM, Mason Green wrote:
Here’s another idea I just came up with, that doesn’t harness
In GR, is there a distinction between coordinate systems and frames of
reference? AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Although his book isn't out yet, how do you think your approach compares to
Philip Goff's:
https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/1117019/galileo-s-error/9781473563353.html
He has written a lot about it via @Philip_Goff.
Goff is sort the "next generation" Galen Strawson:
6 matches
Mail list logo
