Why shouldn't a more natural process prevent Alice from doing this
experiment with the lottery? Something far more probable than winning the
million which does not let this quantum trick happen? This would be similar
to the reasoning you applied to the quantum suicide. It could be much more
probab
Hello Brent,
perhaps one remark concerning your understanding of "einselection".
Please correct me if I am wrong here, but einselection - which is as you
say related to decoherence - is not selecting one state out of a
superposition of states, but selecting a certain basis in a Hilbert
space.
Please substitute in my last post: "this does stay in conflict" by "this
does NOT stay in conflict"!!
Jan Harms schrieb:
> Hello Brent,
>
> perhaps one remark concerning your understanding of "einselection".
> Please correct me if I am wrong here,
Dear Bruno, Dear All
A few days ago, I was reading one of your (Bruno's)
papers (I think it was "Computation, Consciousness and the Quantum"). You wrote
that not only the apparent QM randomness is removed by the MWI (this
point I understand) but also that QM becomes local if one accepts th
> (problem 4)> You get a native, and asks her if Santa
Claus exists.> The native answers this: "If I am a knight then
Santa Claus exists"> What can you deduce about the native, and about
Santa Claus?Lets give a name to the sentence:S="If I am a knight
then Santa Claus exists"1. If t
5 matches
Mail list logo
