Hot off the press, via Boingsters:
http://www.boingboing.net/2004/04/26/many_worlds_theory_i.html
Many Worlds theory invalidated
Kathryn Cramer breaks the story on a to-be-presented Harvard talk on an
experiment that appears to invalidate both the "Many Worlds" and
"Copenhagen" theories of q
BTW, just a caveat --- and I should've caveated the initial forward.
I'm not endorsing this or any interpretation of this experiment at all,
rather just offering it up to the list in case others had not seen it.
$0.02,
jb
On Apr 26, 2004, at 2:34 PM, Jesse Mazer wrote:
Hal Finney wrote:
T
At some point in the past various of us have argued about whether the
simulation argument and / or the multiple worlds interpretation of
quantum mechanics implies an "every possible world" (EPW)
interpretation, i.e. one in which highly improbable events, laws of
physics, etc. obtain.
Stumble
On Aug 19, 2004, at 2:00 PM, Hal Finney wrote:
It's not clear to me that causality and time are inherent properties
of worlds. I include worlds which can be thought of as n-dimensional
cells that satisfy some constraints. Among those constraints could be
ones which induce the effects we identify
4 matches
Mail list logo
