Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Temporal recurrance requires a finite set of states, or an upper bound > on the information contained with observer moments. In the sorts of > plenitudes considered here, there is no such upper bound - OMs can > contain aribitrarily large amounts of information. > If we we really did live in Jorge's library of Babel (which is > finite), then indeed temporal recurrence will be a feature. However, > if that were the case, we'd have an inexplicable number (the number of > books in the library).
How do you explain so that QTI allows (from a first person perspective) this temporal reccurance? I think with this theory you'll can to follow a same set of instants for an eternity (even if, from a third person perspective, you'll follow every possible branches) whereas the probability, on an infinite lenght of time that you follow anothers sets, will tend towards to infinite...
