this point: what is 'reasonable-length'? Why is interpreter supposed to be
limited? If it is, how should it be limited? If interpreter is just
'assumed' and not encoded in any form, can't it be an arbitrary thing, up to
containing all the knowledge you need for any resulting interpretation?
--
Vladimir
and compressed information can still be
shared. If they are interacting as part of the same large state machine
then minds are not islands, and it lends credence to their being a universal
mind.
Jason
--
Vladimir Nesovmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
can be applied to gradual uploading argument.
On 10/2/07, Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/10/2007, Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also single mind can be regarded as collection of parts interacting
with each other. If each part can be regarded as its information
Are you asking why I consider notion of p-zombieness meaningful?
On 10/2/07, Jesse Mazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir Nesov wrote:
Not single mind is half-zombified, but single brain. Half of the brain
implements half of the mind, and another half of the brain is zombie.
Another
On 10/2/07, Jesse Mazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir Nesov wrote:
Are you asking why I consider notion of p-zombieness meaningful?
By p-zombieness are you referring to philosophical zombies? If so, I
suppose I find them meaningful as a philosophical thought-experiment for
making
had been a winner?
Should he?
--
Vladimir Nesovmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL
6 matches
Mail list logo
