Jesse, nobody on this list is unaware of Carter's paper, to which I and
others have referred in several of our papers. The point is, life is a
high-level concept, not relevant to the more fundamental debate I thought we
were having. What was the point of Anthropic Reasoning 101?
So my question
James Higgo wrote:
Jesse,
The point you picked up 'self-referential thought' is not relevant to the
discussion we were having. However, it is the most interesting thing in my
post.
I think it's actually pretty relevant. What we're talking about is what
Nick Bostrom calls the problem of the
2 matches
Mail list logo
