the following content -
From: Cass Silva
Receiver: MindBrain
Time: 2013-11-07, 18:49:59
Subject: Re: [Mind and Brain] A definition of existence (being twofold)
Does Gravity have mass?
Cass
On Wed, 6/11/13, Roger Clough wrote
-
From: Cass Silva
Receiver: MindBrain
Time: 2013-11-07, 18:49:59
Subject: Re: [Mind and Brain] A definition of existence (being twofold)
Does Gravity have mass?
Cass
On Wed, 6/11/13, Roger Clough wrote:
Subject: [Mind and Brain
Leibniz said that space, being massless, is a nonphysical nonentity.
All that physically exists then consists of physical objects with mass-- these
together with their nonphysical mental massless representations
(as mind or will, consciousness, monads).
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.)
That just sounds like definitions. Do they get us anywhere useful?
On 6 November 2013 03:21, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Leibniz said that space, being massless, is a nonphysical nonentity.
All that physically exists then consists of physical objects with mass--
these
together
Yes. It proves that Leibniz was incorrect.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
That just sounds like definitions. Do they get us anywhere useful?
On 6 November 2013 03:21, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Leibniz said that space, being massless, is a
OK!
Moving on.nothing to see here...!
On 6 November 2013 11:28, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. It proves that Leibniz was incorrect.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
That just sounds like definitions. Do they get us anywhere useful?
On
6 matches
Mail list logo
