On 17 Dec 2012, at 12:51, Telmo Menezes wrote:
I believe in the one god of CTM and its (X Z) logically derived
string theory that is omnipotent (contains and carries out the laws
of
physics),
When people claim that an entity is omnipotent, they are generally
implying intentionality on
-12-16, 09:59:56
Subject: Re: A truce: if atheism/materialism is an as if universe
On 16 Dec 2012, at 14:48, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
I probably agree, but what is the primitive
physical universe ?
Any conception of the physical universe in case you assume its
existence
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-19, 09:49:53
Subject: Re: A truce: if atheism/materialism is an as if universe
Hi Roger,
On 17 Dec 2012, at 14:05, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
There seems to be some sort of prejudice given to
proof or theory . As a scientist, all I have to do
is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-16, 09:59:56
Subject: Re: A truce: if atheism/materialism is an as if universe
On 16 Dec 2012, at 14:48, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:09 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/16/2012 9:59 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:44 AM, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/16/2012 8:57 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Richard,
I believe in the one god of CTM and its (X Z)
On 16 Dec 2012, at 20:16, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/16/2012 1:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Dec 2012, at 15:00, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's metaphysics.
1) (My way) The Idealist way, that being L's
On 06 Dec 2012, at 15:00, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's metaphysics.
1) (My way) The Idealist way, that being L's metaphysics as is.
2) (Your way) The atheist/materialist way, that being the usual
: 2012-12-16, 04:40:19
Subject: Re: A truce: if atheism/materialism is an as if universe
On 06 Dec 2012, at 15:00, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's metaphysics.
1) (My way) The Idealist way, that being L's
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/16/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-16, 04:40:19
Subject: Re: A truce: if atheism/materialism is an as if universe
On 06
On 12/16/2012 1:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Dec 2012, at 15:00, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's metaphysics.
1) (My way) The Idealist way, that being L's metaphysics as is.
2) (Your way) The
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/16/2012 1:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Dec 2012, at 15:00, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's metaphysics.
1) (My way) The
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/16/2012 1:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Dec 2012, at 15:00, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over,
Hi Richard,
I believe in the one god of CTM and its (X Z) logically derived
string theory that is omnipotent (contains and carries out the laws of
physics),
When people claim that an entity is omnipotent, they are generally implying
intentionality on the part of the entity.
omniscient
On 12/16/2012 8:57 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Richard,
I believe in the one god of CTM and its (X Z) logically derived
string theory that is omnipotent (contains and carries out the laws of
physics),
When people claim that an entity is omnipotent, they are generally implying
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:44 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/16/2012 8:57 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Richard,
I believe in the one god of CTM and its (X Z) logically derived
string theory that is omnipotent (contains and carries out the laws of
physics),
When people
On 12/16/2012 9:59 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:44 AM, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/16/2012 8:57 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Richard,
I believe in the one god of CTM and its (X Z) logically derived
string theory that is omnipotent (contains and carries
On 09 Dec 2012, at 00:30, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 12/8/2012 2:28 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Dear Stephen,
it is amazing how we formulate our (belief) systems similarly,
except for yours in a descriptive - mine in an agnostic
explanation (=a joke).
Dear John,
;-) I try hard to stay in a
On 12/9/2012 9:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hmm
With CTM it is simple, if our knowledge augment linearly, our
ignorance augments non computably. The more we know, the more we can
intuit how much we don't know, making us wiser (with some luck). We
can jump from big picture to big picture,
content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-06, 14:02:33
Subject: Re: A truce: if atheism/materialism is an as if universe
On 12/6/2012 9:00 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's
-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-12-06, 14:02:33
*Subject:* Re: A truce: if atheism/materialism is an as if universe
On 12/6/2012 9:00 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's metaphysics
. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-12-06, 14:02:33
*Subject:* Re: A truce: if atheism/materialism is an as if universe
On 12/6/2012 9:00 AM, Roger
:33
Subject: Re: A truce: if atheism/materialism is an as if universe
On 12/6/2012 9:00 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's metaphysics.
1) (My way) The Idealist way, that being L's metaphysics as is.
2) (Your
On 12/8/2012 2:28 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Dear Stephen,
it is amazing how we formulate our (belief) systems similarly, except
for yours in a descriptive - mine in an agnostic explanation (=a joke).
Dear John,
;-) I try hard to stay in a superposed state, somewhere between
serious and 'just
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's metaphysics.
1) (My way) The Idealist way, that being L's metaphysics as is.
2) (Your way) The atheist/materialist way, that being the usual
atheist/materialistc view of the universe --- as long as
On 12/6/2012 9:00 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's metaphysics.
1) (My way) The Idealist way, that being L's metaphysics as is.
2) (Your way) The atheist/materialist way, that being the usual
25 matches
Mail list logo
