mega snip
(a) Phenomenal awareness (experience inclusive of a self model)
And
(b) Psychological awareness (knowledge inclusive of a self model)
more snip
Brent Meeker wrote:
Maybe...with some more explication. You're saying that phenomenal
awareness (a) is perception that
includes a model of
Le 26-juil.-06, à 05:08, Colin Hales a écrit :
a) Phenomenal awareness (experience inclusive of a self model)
And
b) Psychological awareness (knowledge inclusive of a self model)
I think I see what you means, and it could corresponds to the 1-3
distinction as it reappear through the lobian
Russell Standish writes:
Consciousnessisthestateof"beinglikesomething"touseNagel's term.Itisalsothecharacteristicofthe"referenceclass"in Anthropicreasoning. Self-awarenessisbeingawareofoneselfasadistinctthingdifferent fromtheenvironment.
Le 24-juil.-06, à 13:56, Russell Standish a écrit :
Consciousness is the state of being like something to use Nagel's
term. It is also the characteristic of the reference class in
Anthropic reasoning.
Self-awareness is being aware of oneself as a distinct thing different
from the
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:46:08AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 24-juil.-06, à 13:56, Russell Standish a écrit :
Consciousness is the state of being like something to use Nagel's
term. It is also the characteristic of the reference class in
Anthropic reasoning.
Self-awareness
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Meeker
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:39 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: COMP Self-awareness
snip, sorry
I'd say it's the other way
Colin Hales wrote:
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Meeker
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:39 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: COMP Self-awareness
snip, sorry
I'd say it's
Le 21-juil.-06, à 08:05, Russell Standish a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 04:38:01PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Functionalism is the same as comp, except that functionalist
traditionally presuppose some knowable high level of substitution (and
then like materialist presuppose a
Hi Colin,
Either your intrinsic parallelism is turing emulable (by dovetailing
to name the standard recipe for implementing form of digital
parallelism), or it is not.
In the first case, you are under the comp conditions and you have to
accept its consequences. In the second case you are just
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 01:30:34PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I am afraid your solon will just have this application: to give a non
standard meaning to functionalism. Even a strict catholic can be a
functionalist in that sense: just imagine that the solon, thanks to
their
Le 20-juil.-06, à 21:01, Russell Standish a écrit :
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 04:49:04PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 20-juil.-06, à 13:46, Russell Standish a écrit :
Bruno, I know in your theory that introspection is a vital component
(the Goedel-like constructions), but I didn't see
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 04:38:01PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Functionalism is the same as comp, except that functionalist
traditionally presuppose some knowable high level of substitution (and
then like materialist presuppose a physical stuffy level).
So I would say comp is just the
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 04:49:04PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 20-juil.-06, à 13:46, Russell Standish a écrit :
Bruno, I know in your theory that introspection is a vital component
(the Goedel-like constructions), but I didn't see how this turns back
onto the self-awareness issue.
13 matches
Mail list logo
