Re: Godel's original proof of completeness

2006-04-04 Thread Bruno Marchal
Le 04-avr.-06, à 10:40, Bruno Marchal a écrit : > For example: (x)(0 ­ s(x)) can be replaced by Ey((x)(y ­ s(x) & (z) Mmh... You are asked to imagine the symbol for "not equal" between the 0 and the s(x), and between the y and s(x). It does not print well! Sorry. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.

Re: Godel's original proof of completeness

2006-04-04 Thread Bruno Marchal
Le 03-avr.-06, ˆ 14:46, LISP a Žcrit : > > Has anybody read Godel's orginal proof before. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ > Original_proof_of_G%C3%B6del%27s_completeness_theorem A long time ago I take a look on it. > > The above proof sketch is partial. > > Like most computer scientists,

Godel's original proof of completeness

2006-04-03 Thread LISP
Has anybody read Godel's orginal proof before. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_proof_of_G%C3%B6del%27s_completeness_theorem The above proof sketch is partial. Like most computer scientists, I was only educated to learn Henkin's proof. One thing I dont understand. It is obvious that Henki