Hmm. How about I think, therefore there is thought - I perceive,
therefore there is perception - and so on? Isn't the subject a (possibly
awarranted) assumption?
On 21 November 2013 19:24, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Leibniz: I think, therefore there is an I
The true meaning
, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Leibniz: I think, therefore there is an I
The true meaning of Descartes' famous dictum, I think, therefore I am
can be clarified further by restating it using Leibniz' model of
being (essence+existent) if the proposition is restated as
I think, therefore
on? Isn't the subject a (possibly awarranted) assumption?
On 21 November 2013 19:24, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net
mailto:rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Leibniz: I think, therefore there is an I
The true meaning of Descartes' famous dictum, I think, therefore I am
can be clarified further
Which could almost be comp, in a nutshell.
On 22 November 2013 07:22, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Bertrand Russell said Descarte stopped his doubting one step to soon.
He should have said what is truly indubitable is, There is thinking.
--
You received this message because you
Leibniz: I think, therefore there is an I
The true meaning of Descartes' famous dictum, I think, therefore I am
can be clarified further by restating it using Leibniz' model of
being (essence+existent) if the proposition is restated as
I think, therefore there is an I, or equivalently as
I
5 matches
Mail list logo