Dear Stephen,
[SPK]
So p is it is not provable that not p? This is a double negative
implying that your logic follows the law of the excluded middle. That is ok,
but I was hoping that you would see that as being a logicwise subset of
Intuitionistic logic, ala Topos and Heyting
Dear Bruno,
Snipping a lot.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: I the mirror
Hello Stephen,
At 13:18 -0500 29/01/2003, Stephen Paul King
Hello Stephen,
At 13:18 -0500 29/01/2003, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Could you translate these symbols into words so that I could better wrap
my mind around them and spin them around in my head?
BM:
Basically []p = provable p in such a precise way that
1) you can verify the proof in a finite
Dear Bruno,
Interleaving many comments.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: I the mirror
Hi Stephen,
SPK:
I have no difficulties
that I am
working on.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:18 AM
Subject: Re: I the mirror
Hi Stephen,
At 10:52 -0500 22/01/2003, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Colin Hales [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:21 AM
Subject: Re: I the mirror
At 11:59 +1100 21/01/2003, Colin Hales wrote:
This is a query placed as a result of failing to succeed to find
Hi Stephen,
At 10:52 -0500 22/01/2003, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Thank you for the reference to the Case papers. It is ironic that his
argument makes the case for the subtle issue that I am trying to point out
to you, that there is a grave problem with your model.
In
At 11:59 +1100 21/01/2003, Colin Hales wrote:
This is a query placed as a result of failing to succeed to find answers
when googling my way around the place for a very long time (2 years). I am
about to conclude that a) no such discourse exists or b) that it is
disguised in a form of
Hi,
Onar Aam wrote some nice essays on mirrors and awareness, a few years back.
He had a quite elaborate theory.
Unfortunately, his website seems not to be up anymore.
However, if you e-mail him, he will probably send them to you. A year ago
his e-mail was [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I'm not 100%
The ancient Egyptians were the first to identify
'mirror' with first-person experience, some 5000
years ago.
The word ankh means both 'life' and 'mirror'
since full living-reality was what visually
appears represented on the surface of 'mirrors'.
Whether there was 'self-experience' there or not
10 matches
Mail list logo