James Higgo wrote:
...
All that exists of 'you' is this very current thought. Whle
'the measure of some objective George Levy' is meaningless, 'the measure of
this thought' is a vaild concept; I'm not sure what you can do to increase
or decrease that. An interesting area is the categorisation
.
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 13 August, 2000 4:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Extra Terrestrials
In a message dated 08/08/2000 2:36:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In a message dated 08/12/2000 11:12:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I
guess I still don't see a problem here - unless it is the peculiarity that
'
his
universe' is defined retrospectively from his death. I don't see that the
large number of other branches which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just want to be more explicit in my characterization of the guardian
angels, the fatalisitic slobs and the narcissistic gods.
George,
I don't know how you justify dividing the ETs into such neat
categories, based on the MWI and the feasability of QS. That is
4 matches
Mail list logo
